A Multi-Stage Multi-Codebook VQ-VAE Approach to High-Performance Neural TTS
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Multi-Stage, Multi-Codebook (MSMC) approach to high-performance neural Text-to-Speech (TTS) synthesis
- Vector-quantized, variational autoencoder (VQ-VAE) based feature analyzer for encoding Mel spectrograms
- Progressive down-sampling of spectrograms in multiple stages to create MSMC Representations (MSMCRs)
- Quantization of MSMCRs using multiple VQ codebooks
- Training with multi-stage predictors and a combined loss function including reconstruction MSE and triplet loss
- Use of a neural vocoder for synthesizing speech waveforms from predicted MSMCRs
- Evaluation on an English TTS database, achieving higher MOS scores than the baseline system
- Compact versions of the proposed TTS system also maintain high MOS scores
- Ablation studies show that both multiple stages and multiple codebooks contribute to performance improvement.
Authors: Haohan Guo, Fenglong Xie, Frank K. Soong, Xixin Wu, Helen Meng
Abstract: We propose a Multi-Stage, Multi-Codebook (MSMC) approach to high-performance neural TTS synthesis. A vector-quantized, variational autoencoder (VQ-VAE) based feature analyzer is used to encode Mel spectrograms of speech training data by down-sampling progressively in multiple stages into MSMC Representations (MSMCRs) with different time resolutions, and quantizing them with multiple VQ codebooks, respectively. Multi-stage predictors are trained to map the input text sequence to MSMCRs progressively by minimizing a combined loss of the reconstruction Mean Square Error (MSE) and "triplet loss". In synthesis, the neural vocoder converts the predicted MSMCRs into final speech waveforms. The proposed approach is trained and tested with an English TTS database of 16 hours by a female speaker. The proposed TTS achieves an MOS score of 4.41, which outperforms the baseline with an MOS of 3.62. Compact versions of the proposed TTS with much less parameters can still preserve high MOS scores. Ablation studies show that both multiple stages and multiple codebooks are effective for achieving high TTS performance.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.