Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.08348v1

The desire to build high-quality software systems has been a longstanding focus for software developers and researchers. Over the years, various practices have been developed to promote quality in software design. These practices have evolved from the traditional software development life cycle (SDLC) to object-oriented methods, iterative development, and now agile methods. Despite the different perspectives of these software development processes, certain quality practices have persisted throughout history. In this paper, the author reviews three representative software development methods to identify key quality practices and understand their role in each method. The aim is also to highlight the quality practices that have endured over time. The identified long-standing quality practices include prototyping, iterative development, incremental development, risk-driven development, phase planning, and phase retrospection. These findings are valuable for method engineers who are designing high-quality software development methods as these enduring practices can be considered for inclusion in their processes. Additionally, software development practitioners seeking to create quality software can benefit from adopting these long-standing practices in their own projects. Overall, this research emphasizes the importance of incorporating proven quality practices into software development methodologies and highlights specific techniques that have stood the test of time. By leveraging these enduring strategies, developers can enhance the overall quality of their software systems.

• - The desire to build high-quality software systems has been a longstanding focus for software developers and researchers.
• - Various practices have been developed to promote quality in software design.
• - These practices have evolved from the traditional SDLC to object-oriented methods, iterative development, and now agile methods.
• - Certain quality practices have persisted throughout history despite different perspectives of software development processes.
• - The paper reviews three representative software development methods to identify key quality practices and understand their role in each method.
• - The identified long-standing quality practices include prototyping, iterative development, incremental development, risk-driven development, phase planning, and phase retrospection.
• - These enduring practices can be considered for inclusion in high-quality software development methods.
• - Software development practitioners can benefit from adopting these long-standing practices in their own projects.
• - Incorporating proven quality practices into software development methodologies is important for enhancing the overall quality of software systems.

1. Software developers and researchers have always wanted to create good software. 2. Different methods have been created to make sure software is made well. 3. These methods have changed over time, from traditional ways to newer agile ways. 4. Some practices for making good software have stayed the same throughout history. 5. The paper talks about three different methods and how they use these practices. Definitions- Software: Programs or instructions that tell a computer what to do. - Quality: How good something is. - Design: Planning and creating something, like a building or a program. - Development: The process of making something, like software or a product. - Methodologies: Ways of doing things in a planned and organized way.

Software Quality Practices: A Review of Three Software Development Methods

Software development is a complex process that requires careful planning and execution to ensure the successful delivery of high-quality software systems. Over the years, various practices have been developed to promote quality in software design. These practices have evolved from the traditional software development life cycle (SDLC) to object-oriented methods, iterative development, and now agile methods. Despite the different perspectives of these software development processes, certain quality practices have persisted throughout history. In this paper, we review three representative software development methods – SDLC, object-oriented methodology (OODM), and agile methodology – to identify key quality practices and understand their role in each method. The aim is also to highlight the quality practices that have endured over time.

The Traditional Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)

The traditional SDLC consists of six distinct phases: requirements gathering/analysis; design; implementation; testing; deployment; and maintenance/support. Each phase has its own set of activities associated with it that must be completed before moving on to the next phase. Quality assurance is an integral part of this process as it helps ensure that all aspects of the system are working correctly according to user requirements. Quality assurance activities during SDLC include prototyping, risk assessment/management, code reviews, unit testing, integration testing, system testing and acceptance testing. Prototyping allows developers to quickly create a working model for feedback from stakeholders early in the project lifecycle which can help reduce risks associated with developing a new product or feature later on in the process. Risk assessment/management involves identifying potential risks early on in order for them to be addressed before they become major problems down the line while code reviews allow developers to detect errors or inconsistencies within their codebase which could lead to bugs or other issues further down the road if not addressed promptly. Unit tests are used throughout each stage of implementation while integration tests ensure components work together properly when combined into larger systems while system tests validate functionality against user requirements prior to release into production environments where acceptance tests provide final validation by users prior to signoff on completion of projects successfully meeting all objectives outlined at outset..

Object-Oriented Methodology (OODM)

Object-oriented methodology focuses heavily on modularity as well as reusability through encapsulation which makes it easier for teams working on large projects with multiple components spread across multiple locations or even countries since modules can be reused without having knowledge about how they were originally created allowing for faster turnaround times when making changes due adjustments needed along way instead starting from scratch every single time something needs updating . OODM also emphasizes iterative development cycles which involve breaking up tasks into smaller chunks then gradually building upon them until desired result achieved rather than trying tackle entire project one go leading better overall results since any mistakes made earlier stages can easily corrected without too much effort wasted redoing everything again from start . Additionally , OODM encourages incremental development whereby features added incrementally over course several iterations rather than trying cram everything into single version resulting more manageable workloads less pressure completing tasks within tight deadlines . Finally , OODM promotes risk-driven approach where potential risks identified early so appropriate measures taken mitigate them before becoming major issues later down line saving both time money long run .

Agile Methodology

Agile methodology takes an iterative approach similar OODM but adds additional layer flexibility allowing teams respond quickly changing customer demands without sacrificing quality end product . Agile emphasizes collaboration between stakeholders including customers , developers testers ensuring everyone involved same page terms expectations deliverables being produced . Additionally , agile encourages phase planning wherein goals milestones established beginning each iteration followed retrospection end analyze what went right wrong inform decisions future iterations helping keep track progress towards ultimate goal successful completion project meeting all objectives set out outset .

Conclusion

This research highlights several key quality practices that have endured over time regardless specific methodologies employed such as prototyping , iterative development , incremental development , risk driven approaches phase planning retrospection among others All these strategies should considered when designing high -quality software processes either by method engineers looking create new ones practitioners seeking improve existing ones leveraging proven techniques enhance overall quality their products Ultimately understanding importance incorporating these long -standing principles will only benefit those involved ultimately leading higher levels satisfaction both sides table