Extreme Value Statistics of the Halo and Stellar Mass Distributions at High Redshift: are JWST Results in Tension with ΛCDM?

AI-generated keywords: Dark Matter $\Lambda$CDM Cosmology High Redshift Extreme Value Statistics Cosmic Variance

AI-generated Key Points

  • The distribution of dark matter halo masses can be accurately predicted in the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology
  • Recent measurements of very large galaxy stellar masses at high redshift ($z > 8$) have prompted an investigation into whether these objects are in tension with $\Lambda$CDM
  • Extreme value statistics are utilized to generate confidence regions in the mass-redshift plane for the most extreme mass haloes and galaxies
  • Tests against numerical models reveal no tension in either their dark matter halo masses or their galaxy stellar masses
  • There is a tentative $> 3\sigma$ tension observed with recent observational determinations of galaxy masses at high redshift from both HST and JWST, despite using conservative estimates for the stellar fraction ($f_{\star} \sim 1$)
  • This suggests that either these galaxies are indeed in tension with $\Lambda$CDM, or there are unaccounted for uncertainties in their stellar mass or redshift estimates
  • The study does not consider the effect of surveys taken from multiple areas of the sky which Behroozi & Silk (2018) argue increases the likelihood of containing outliers
  • Observational errors leading to Eddington and Malmquist bias have a much larger impact on predicted probabilities than cosmic variance effect within the extreme value statistics framework
  • With upcoming wide field surveys, it is expected that a number of galaxies will be detected that may potentially be in tension with predictions from $\Lambda$CDM or require extreme conversion rates of baryons into stars
  • The presented predictions and publicly accessible code aim to provide valuable insights into these potential tensions and aid further research in understanding the effects of region selection.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christopher C. Lovell, Ian Harrison, Yuichi Harikane, Sandro Tacchella, Stephen M. Wilkins

arXiv: 2208.10479v2 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
11 pages, 7 figures, Accepted to MNRAS
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The distribution of dark matter halo masses can be accurately predicted in the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. The presence of a single massive halo or galaxy at a particular redshift, assuming some baryon and stellar fraction for the latter, can therefore be used to test the underlying cosmological model. A number of recent measurements of very large galaxy stellar masses at high redshift ($z > 8$) motivate an investigation into whether any of these objects are in tension with $\Lambda$CDM. We use extreme value statistics to generate confidence regions in the mass-redshift plane for the most extreme mass haloes and galaxies. Tests against numerical models show no tension, neither in their dark matter halo masses nor their galaxy stellar masses. However, we find tentative $> 3\sigma$ tension with recent observational determinations of galaxy masses at high redshift from both HST & JWST, despite using conservative estimates for the stellar fraction ($f_{\star} \sim 1$). Either these galaxies are in tension with $\Lambda$CDM, or there are unaccounted for uncertainties in their stellar mass or redshift estimates.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.10479v2

The distribution of dark matter halo masses can be accurately predicted in the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, allowing for the testing of the underlying cosmological model by examining the presence of a single massive halo or galaxy at a specific redshift. Recent measurements of very large galaxy stellar masses at high redshift ($z > 8$) have prompted an investigation into whether these objects are in tension with $\Lambda$CDM. In this study, extreme value statistics are utilized to generate confidence regions in the mass-redshift plane for the most extreme mass haloes and galaxies. Tests against numerical models reveal no tension in either their dark matter halo masses or their galaxy stellar masses. However, there is a tentative $> 3\sigma$ tension observed with recent observational determinations of galaxy masses at high redshift from both HST and JWST, despite using conservative estimates for the stellar fraction ($f_{\star} \sim 1$). This suggests that either these galaxies are indeed in tension with $\Lambda$CDM, or there are unaccounted for uncertainties in their stellar mass or redshift estimates. It should be noted that this study does not consider the effect of surveys taken from multiple areas of the sky which Behroozi & Silk (2018) argue increases the likelihood of containing outliers. However, it is emphasized that observational errors leading to Eddington and Malmquist bias have a much larger impact on predicted probabilities. Incorporating this cosmic variance effect within the extreme value statistics framework is left as future work. With upcoming wide field surveys, it is expected that a number of galaxies will be detected that may potentially be in tension with predictions from $\Lambda$CDM or require extreme conversion rates of baryons into stars. The presented predictions and publicly accessible code aim to provide valuable insights into these potential tensions and aid further research in understanding the effects of region selection.
Created on 13 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.