Are You Comfortable Now: Deep Learning the Temporal Variation in Thermal Comfort in Winters

AI-generated keywords: Indoor thermal comfort Machine learning Circadian rhythm Outdoor temperature Temporal variability

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on indoor thermal comfort in smart buildings and its impact on occupants' health and performance
  • Increasing use of machine learning (ML) to address challenges related to indoor thermal comfort, specifically temporal variability
  • Importance of considering circadian rhythm and outdoor temperature in ML models for accurate predictions
  • Data collected from month-long field experiments in 14 classrooms involving 512 primary school students
  • Four thermal comfort metrics used as outputs for Deep Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine models
  • Temporal factors such as time of day and outdoor temperature variations significantly influence prediction accuracy (up to 80% improvement)
  • Contrasting micro-level (location-specific) and macro-level (city-wide) performance metrics highlight importance of spatio-temporal context
  • Increase in time of day and sky illuminance leads to enhanced prediction accuracy for multiple thermal comfort metrics
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Betty Lala, Srikant Manas Kala, Anmol Rastogi, Kunal Dahiya, Aya Hagishima

Accepted for publication in IEEE SMC 2022
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Indoor thermal comfort in smart buildings has a significant impact on the health and performance of occupants. Consequently, machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to solve challenges related to indoor thermal comfort. Temporal variability of thermal comfort perception is an important problem that regulates occupant well-being and energy consumption. However, in most ML-based thermal comfort studies, temporal aspects such as the time of day, circadian rhythm, and outdoor temperature are not considered. This work addresses these problems. It investigates the impact of circadian rhythm and outdoor temperature on the prediction accuracy and classification performance of ML models. The data is gathered through month-long field experiments carried out in 14 classrooms of 5 schools, involving 512 primary school students. Four thermal comfort metrics are considered as the outputs of Deep Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine models for the dataset. The effect of temporal variability on school children's comfort is shown through a "time of day" analysis. Temporal variability in prediction accuracy is demonstrated (up to 80%). Furthermore, we show that outdoor temperature (varying over time) positively impacts the prediction performance of thermal comfort models by up to 30%. The importance of spatio-temporal context is demonstrated by contrasting micro-level (location specific) and macro-level (6 locations across a city) performance. The most important finding of this work is that a definitive improvement in prediction accuracy is shown with an increase in the time of day and sky illuminance, for multiple thermal comfort metrics.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.09628v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study titled "Are You Comfortable Now: Deep Learning the Temporal Variation in Thermal Comfort in Winters" by Betty Lala, Srikant Manas Kala, Anmol Rastogi, Kunal Dahiya, and Aya Hagishima delves into the crucial role of indoor thermal comfort in smart buildings on the health and performance of occupants. The authors highlight the increasing use of machine learning (ML) to address challenges related to indoor thermal comfort, with a specific focus on the temporal variability of thermal comfort perception. In most ML-based studies on thermal comfort, temporal aspects such as the time of day, circadian rhythm, and outdoor temperature are often overlooked. This research aims to fill this gap by investigating how circadian rhythm and outdoor temperature impact the prediction accuracy and classification performance of ML models. The data for this study was collected through month-long field experiments conducted in 14 classrooms across 5 schools, involving 512 primary school students. The study considers four thermal comfort metrics as outputs for Deep Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine models applied to the dataset. Through a detailed analysis of the "time of day," the authors demonstrate how temporal variability influences school children's comfort levels. They show a significant improvement in prediction accuracy (up to 80%) when considering temporal factors such as outdoor temperature variations over time. Furthermore, the importance of spatio-temporal context is highlighted by contrasting micro-level (location-specific) and macro-level (6 locations across a city) performance metrics. The findings reveal that an increase in the time of day and sky illuminance leads to a definitive enhancement in prediction accuracy for multiple thermal comfort metrics. Overall, this study sheds light on the intricate relationship between circadian rhythm, outdoor temperature fluctuations, and temporal variability in predicting indoor thermal comfort levels. By incorporating these factors into ML models, researchers can better understand and optimize indoor environments for enhanced occupant well-being and energy efficiency.
Created on 06 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.