FedComm: Understanding Communication Protocols for Edge-based Federated Learning

AI-generated keywords: Communication Overhead

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper addresses the issue of communication overhead and its impact on federated learning (FL) systems.
  • FedComm is a benchmarking methodology proposed by the authors to quantify the impact of various application layer protocols on FL performance.
  • The study focuses on both optimized protocols (MQTT, AMQP, ZMTP) and non-optimized protocols (TCP, UDP).
  • FedComm measures FL performance in terms of communication time and accuracy under varying stress conditions.
  • TCP outperforms UDP as a non-optimized protocol in terms of accuracy and shorter communication times for 4G and Wi-Fi networks.
  • Optimized protocols such as AMQP, MQTT, and ZMTP achieve a 2.5x reduction in communication time compared to TCP while maintaining accuracy.
  • The results provide valuable insights for designing efficient FL systems.
  • FedComm is available for download from GitHub.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gary Cleland, Di Wu, Rehmat Ullah, Blesson Varghese

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) trains machine learning (ML) models on devices using locally generated data and exchanges models without transferring raw data to a distant server. This exchange incurs a communication overhead and impacts the performance of FL training. There is limited understanding of how communication protocols specifically contribute to the performance of FL. Such an understanding is essential for selecting the right communication protocol when designing an FL system. This paper presents FedComm, a benchmarking methodology to quantify the impact of optimized application layer protocols, namely Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT), Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), and ZeroMQ Message Transport Protocol (ZMTP), and non-optimized application layer protocols, namely as TCP and UDP, on the performance of FL. FedComm measures the overall performance of FL in terms of communication time and accuracy under varying computational and network stress and packet loss rates. Experiments on a lab-based testbed demonstrate that TCP outperforms UDP as a non-optimized application layer protocol with higher accuracy and shorter communication times for 4G and Wi-Fi networks. Optimized application layer protocols such as AMQP, MQTT, and ZMTP outperformed non-optimized application layer protocols in most network conditions, resulting in a 2.5x reduction in communication time compared to TCP while maintaining accuracy. The experimental results enable us to highlight a number of open research issues for further investigation. FedComm is available for download from https://github.com/qub-blesson/FedComm.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.08764v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "FedComm: Understanding Communication Protocols for Edge-based Federated Learning" addresses the issue of communication overhead and its impact on the performance of federated learning (FL) systems. FL is a machine learning technique that trains models on devices using locally generated data, without transferring raw data to a central server. The authors propose FedComm, a benchmarking methodology that quantifies the impact of various application layer protocols on FL performance. They highlight the limited understanding of how different communication protocols contribute to the efficiency of FL training and aim to fill this gap with their research. The study focuses on both optimized protocols like Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT), Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), and ZeroMQ Message Transport Protocol (ZMTP), as well as non-optimized protocols like TCP and UDP. FedComm measures the overall performance of FL in terms of communication time and accuracy under varying computational and network stress conditions, including packet loss rates. The experiments are conducted on a lab-based testbed to evaluate the performance of different protocols. The results show that TCP outperforms UDP as a non-optimized application layer protocol in terms of accuracy and shorter communication times for 4G and Wi-Fi networks. Additionally, optimized application layer protocols such as AMQP, MQTT, and ZMTP outperform non-optimized protocols in most network conditions, achieving a 2.5x reduction in communication time compared to TCP while maintaining accuracy. These findings provide valuable insights for designing efficient FL systems. In conclusion, this paper presents FedComm as a benchmarking methodology for understanding how different communication protocols impact the performance of edge-based federated learning systems. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of optimized application layer protocols over non-optimized ones, shedding light on several open research issues in the field of FL. The authors make their benchmarking methodology FedComm available for download from GitHub.
Created on 16 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.