Conformal Risk Control
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper introduces an extension of conformal prediction for controlling the expected value of any monotone loss function
- The algorithm builds upon split conformal prediction and includes a coverage guarantee
- Similar to traditional conformal prediction, the proposed procedure is accurate up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor
- Worked examples in computer vision and natural language processing demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm
- The approach can be used to bound metrics such as false negative rate, graph distance, and token-level F1-score
- The paper expands on conformal prediction techniques and introduces a method for controlling different loss functions' expected values
- Practical applications in computer vision and natural language processing highlight the potential usefulness of this approach in real-world scenarios
- Suitable for use with large datasets due to its accuracy up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor
Authors: Anastasios N. Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Adam Fisch, Lihua Lei, Tal Schuster
Abstract: We extend conformal prediction to control the expected value of any monotone loss function. The algorithm generalizes split conformal prediction together with its coverage guarantee. Like conformal prediction, the conformal risk control procedure is tight up to an $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ factor. Worked examples from computer vision and natural language processing demonstrate the usage of our algorithm to bound the false negative rate, graph distance, and token-level F1-score.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.