Lumen Shape Reconstruction using a Soft Robotic Balloon Catheter and Electrical Impedance Tomography
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Incorrectly sized balloon catheters can lead to increased post-surgical complications
- Selecting the correct size remains a challenge even with preoperative imaging
- Limited feedback during surgery makes it difficult to verify proper deployment of the catheter
- Authors propose using integrated impedance measurements and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) imaging to assess balloon deformation and determine lumen size and shape
- Previous methods relied on single impedance measurements or pressure data and analytical models, assuming circular cross section of the lumen
- Authors extend these methods by adding multiple electrodes to detect elliptical and occluded lumens
- Numerical simulations conducted using a 14 Fr (5.3 mm) catheter found optimal electrode configuration of two rings of eight electrodes spaced 10 mm apart
- Simulation predicted that as balloon size increased from 14mm to 30mm, maximum detectable aspect ratio decreased from 0.9 to 0.5
- Sizing accuracy and ellipticity detection results were experimentally verified
- Prototype robotic balloon catheter developed for automatic inflation while recording EIT and pressure data
- Experiments performed to replicate stenotic vessels with elliptical and asymmetrical profiles, as well as simulate lumen widening during angioplasty
- System successfully localized occlusions and detected aspect ratios of 0.75 after calibration
- EIT images provided further localization of occlusions and visualization of lumen dilation during balloon inflation
Authors: James Avery, Mark Runciman, Cristina Fiani, Elena Monfort Sanchez, Saina Akhond, Zhuang Liu, Kirill Aristovich, George Mylonas
Abstract: Incorrectly sized balloon catheters can lead to increased post-surgical complications, yet even with preoperative imaging, correct selection remains a challenge. With limited feedback during surgery, it is difficult to verify correct deployment. We propose the use of integrated impedance measurements and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) imaging to assess the deformation of the balloon and determine the size and shape of the surrounding lumen. Previous work using single impedance measurements, or pressure data and analytical models, whilst demonstrating high sizing accuracy, have assumed a circular cross section. Here we extend these methods by adding a multitude of electrodes to detect elliptical and occluded lumen and obtain EIT images to localise deformations. Using a 14 Fr (5.3 mm) catheter as an example, numerical simulations were performed to find the optimal electrode configuration of two rings of 8 electrodes spaced 10 mm apart. The simulations predicted that the maximum detectable aspect ratio decreased from 0.9 for a 14mm balloon to 0.5 at 30mm. The sizing and ellipticity detection results were verified experimentally. A prototype robotic balloon catheter was constructed to automatically inflate a compliant balloon while simultaneously recording EIT and pressure data. Data were collected in experiments replicating stenotic vessels with an elliptical and asymmetrical profile, and the widening of a lumen during angioplasty. After calibration, the system was able to correctly localise the occlusion and detect aspect ratios of 0.75. EIT images further localised the occlusion and visualised the dilation of the lumen during balloon inflation.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.