Evolution of the public opinion on COVID-19 vaccination in Japan

AI-generated keywords: COVID-19 Vaccination Japan Public Opinion Social Platforms

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on the evolution of public opinion regarding COVID-19 vaccination in Japan
  • Over 100 million vaccine-related tweets collected from 8 million users
  • Latent Dirichlet Allocation model used for automated topic modeling
  • 15 topics identified, grouped into four themes: Personal issue, Breaking news, Politics, and Conspiracy and humour
  • Shift in public opinion over time: initially focused on personal issues and acquiring knowledge from news, criticism of government's handling of vaccination campaign; later shifted towards sharing personal experiences
  • Interrupted time series regression analysis conducted to examine impact of critical events on public opinion
  • Tokyo Olympic Games had significant effect on public opinion but did not influence vaccination campaign
  • Various events affected public opinion on politics positively early on but negatively later
  • Tweets about personal issues more likely to be retweeted when targeting younger populations during vaccination campaign
  • Public engagement through social platforms played crucial role in speeding up vaccine uptake by reducing anxiety through social learning and support
  • Governments should engage with citizens through social media to allow sharing of experiences and learning from each other's stories
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuri Nakayama, Yuka Takedomi, Towa Suda, Takeaki Uno, Takako Hashimoto, Masashi Toyoda, Naoki Yoshinaga, Masaru Kitsuregawa, Luis E. C. Rocha, Ryota Kobayashi

arXiv: 2207.10924v1 - DOI (physics.soc-ph)

Abstract: Vaccines are promising tools to control the spread of COVID-19. An effective vaccination campaign requires government policies and community engagement, sharing experiences for social support, and voicing concerns to vaccine safety and efficiency. The increasing use of online social platforms allows us to trace large-scale communication and infer public opinion in real-time. We collected more than 100 million vaccine-related tweets posted by 8 million users and used the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model to perform automated topic modeling of tweet texts during the vaccination campaign in Japan. We identified 15 topics grouped into 4 themes on Personal issue, Breaking news, Politics, and Conspiracy and humour. The evolution of the popularity of themes revealed a shift in public opinion, initially sharing the attention over personal issues (individual aspect), collecting information from the news (knowledge acquisition), and government criticisms, towards personal experiences once confidence in the vaccination campaign was established. An interrupted time series regression analysis showed that the Tokyo Olympic Games affected public opinion more than other critical events but not the course of the vaccination. Public opinion on politics was significantly affected by various events, positively shifting the attention in the early stages of the vaccination campaign and negatively later. Tweets about personal issues were mostly retweeted when the vaccination reached the younger population. The associations between the vaccination campaign stages and tweet themes suggest that the public engagement in the social platform contributed to speedup vaccine uptake by reducing anxiety via social learning and support.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jul. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.10924v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study focuses on the evolution of public opinion regarding COVID-19 vaccination in Japan. The researchers collected over 100 million vaccine-related tweets from 8 million users and used the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model to perform automated topic modeling. They identified 15 topics grouped into four themes: Personal issue, Breaking news, Politics, and Conspiracy and humour. The analysis revealed a shift in public opinion over time. Initially, there was attention towards personal issues and acquiring knowledge from the news, as well as criticisms of the government's handling of the vaccination campaign. However, as confidence in the campaign grew, there was a shift towards sharing personal experiences. The researchers also conducted an interrupted time series regression analysis to examine the impact of critical events on public opinion. They found that while the Tokyo Olympic Games had a significant effect on public opinion, it did not influence the course of the vaccination campaign. Various events also affected public opinion on politics positively in the early stages but negatively later. Furthermore, they observed that tweets about personal issues were more likely to be retweeted when targeting younger populations during the vaccination campaign. Overall, these findings suggest that public engagement through social platforms played a crucial role in speeding up vaccine uptake by reducing anxiety through social learning and support. This highlights how important it is for governments to engage with citizens through social media when launching campaigns like this one so that people can share their experiences and learn from each other's stories.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.