Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.00747v1

In recent research, it has been shown that incorporating , which are step-by-step chains of thought, can enhance performance in multi-step reasoning tasks. This concept has been extended to by expanding prompts from (input -> output) to (input, rationale -> output) prompts. However, existing approaches that rely on manual prompt engineering for rationale-augmented prompting may result in sub-optimal rationales that could potentially hinder performance. To address this issue, a unified of rationale-augmented ensembles has been proposed, with a focus on rationale sampling in the output space as a key component for robustly improving performance. While much of the work on rationales stems from the natural language processing literature, there is also growing interest in similar mechanisms within the realm of program synthesis. For instance, Nye et al. (2021) have utilized pretrained language models to predict intermediate states of program behavior line-by-line, demonstrating significant improvements in execution prediction accuracy through step-by-step reasoning described by a formal language. Additionally, Pi et al. (2022) have shown that pre-training language models as program executors can enhance reasoning task performance. The proposed framework for rationale-augmented ensembles emphasizes the importance of sampling diverse rationales and ensembling the results to outperform standard prompting and rationale-based few-shot prompting across various natural language tasks and alternative language models. By shifting from traditional (input -> output) pairs to (input, rationale -> output) pairs, this approach not only improves accuracy but also enhances of model predictions through associated rationales. However, while the framework reduces sensitivity to human-written rationales, some initial seed rationales are still necessary and could potentially bias the generation of output rationales if not diverse enough. It has been observed that patterns expressed in written rationales can influence a model's generated rationales; therefore, diversity in seed rationales is crucial for inducing variability in generated rationales. Overall, this study aims to encourage further research into how language models respond to variations in few-shot exemplars to develop more robust approaches for generating effective prompts tailored to specific tasks. The incorporation of rationale-augmented ensembles presents a promising avenue for achieving more accurate and interpretable natural language processing outcomes across a range of applications.

• - Incorporating rationale-augmented prompting can enhance performance in multi-step reasoning tasks
• - Existing approaches relying on manual prompt engineering for rationale-augmented prompting may lead to sub-optimal rationales
• - A unified framework of rationale-augmented ensembles has been proposed, focusing on rationale sampling in the output space to improve performance robustly
• - Interest in similar mechanisms within program synthesis is growing, with examples like predicting intermediate states of program behavior and pre-training language models as program executors
• - The proposed framework emphasizes sampling diverse rationales and ensembling results to outperform standard prompting and rationale-based few-shot prompting across various natural language tasks and alternative language models
• - Diversity in seed rationales is crucial to induce variability in generated rationales and reduce bias
• - Further research is encouraged to explore how language models respond to variations in few-shot exemplars for developing more robust approaches tailored to specific tasks

Summary- Using a special kind of help called rationale-augmented prompting can make it easier to do tasks that need many steps. - Some ways of giving this special help might not be the best and could give not-so-good reasons for doing things. - A new way of giving this helpful prompt has been suggested, which focuses on picking different reasons to improve how well we do tasks. - People are also interested in using similar ideas when making computer programs, like guessing what happens next or training computers to understand language better. - The new idea suggests using different reasons and combining results to do better than usual prompts and reason-based hints in different language tasks. Definitions- Rationale-augmented prompting: Providing additional explanations or reasoning to assist in completing tasks that involve multiple steps. - Ensembles: A group of things working together as a whole, such as combining different ideas or results for better performance. - Few-shot prompting: Giving small amounts of examples or hints to help with understanding a task quickly.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in incorporating step-by-step chains of thought, or rationales, into natural language processing (NLP) tasks. These rationales provide a deeper understanding of the reasoning process behind model predictions and have been shown to enhance performance in multi-step reasoning tasks. However, existing approaches that rely on manual prompt engineering for rationale-augmented prompting may result in sub-optimal rationales that could potentially hinder performance. To address this issue, a unified framework for rationale-augmented ensembles has been proposed by researchers. This framework focuses on the importance of sampling diverse rationales and ensembling the results to outperform standard prompting and rationale-based few-shot prompting across various NLP tasks and alternative language models. The concept of incorporating rationales into NLP tasks is not entirely new. In fact, much of the work on rationales stems from the natural language processing literature. However, there is also growing interest in similar mechanisms within the realm of program synthesis. For instance, Nye et al. (2021) have utilized pretrained language models to predict intermediate states of program behavior line-by-line, demonstrating significant improvements in execution prediction accuracy through step-by-step reasoning described by a formal language. Additionally, Pi et al. (2022) have shown that pre-training language models as program executors can enhance reasoning task performance. This further supports the idea that incorporating step-by-step chains of thought can lead to more accurate and interpretable outcomes across a range of applications. The proposed framework for rationale-augmented ensembles builds upon previous research by emphasizing the importance of sampling diverse rationales from the output space rather than relying solely on human-written prompts for input-output pairs. By shifting from traditional (input -> output) pairs to (input, rationale -> output) pairs, this approach not only improves accuracy but also enhances interpretability through associated rationales. One key component highlighted by this framework is the importance of diversity in seed rationales. While the framework reduces sensitivity to human-written rationales, some initial seed rationales are still necessary and could potentially bias the generation of output rationales if not diverse enough. It has been observed that patterns expressed in written rationales can influence a model's generated rationales; therefore, diversity in seed rationales is crucial for inducing variability in generated rationales. Overall, this study aims to encourage further research into how language models respond to variations in few-shot exemplars to develop more robust approaches for generating effective prompts tailored to specific tasks. The incorporation of rationale-augmented ensembles presents a promising avenue for achieving more accurate and interpretable NLP outcomes across a range of applications. In conclusion, incorporating step-by-step chains of thought or rationales into NLP tasks has shown great potential for enhancing performance and interpretability. However, manual prompt engineering may lead to sub-optimal results. The proposed framework for rationale-augmented ensembles addresses this issue by emphasizing the importance of sampling diverse rationales from the output space and ensembling the results. This approach has shown promising results across various NLP tasks and alternative language models, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for improving NLP outcomes. Further research on this topic will undoubtedly lead to even more advanced techniques and applications in natural language processing.