Dissecting the dot-com bubble in the 1990s NASDAQ
AI-generated Key Points
- Yuchao Fan revisits the seminal 2011 paper by Phillips, Wu, and Yu on testing for the dot-com bubble in the 1990s NASDAQ.
- Fan applies recent advancements of methods to individual Nasdaq stocks and uses a novel specification for fundamentals to generate a detailed sectoral breakdown of the dot-com bubble.
- The analysis reveals that the dot-com bubble comprised multiple overlapping episodes of exuberance with two distinct starting dates for internet exuberance.
- Challenges related to stock exchange data discrepancies were encountered, leading to a reduction in sample size from 400,139 to 339,707 observations by cross-referencing PERMNOs with CRSP data and excluding periods based on CRSP exchange variables.
- Gaps in stock price series were addressed by treating them as separate units rather than interpolating missing data. Stocks with fewer than nine observations were excluded from the analysis, resulting in a final dataset of 328,514 observations representing 10,704 unique stocks.
- Fan's research methodology overcame data challenges to analyze the dot-com bubble within specific sectors of the NASDAQ market, shedding light on complexities of exuberance episodes and contributing valuable information to understanding historical market trends.
Authors: Yuchao Fan
Abstract: In this paper, I revisit Phillips, Wu and Yu's seminal 2011 paper on testing for the dot-com bubble. I apply recent advancements of their methods to individual Nasdaq stocks and use a novel specification for fundamentals. To address a divide in the literature, I generate a detailed sectoral breakdown of the dot-com bubble. I find that it comprised multiple overlapping episodes of exuberance and that there were indeed two starting dates for internet exuberance.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.