NeuPSL: Neural Probabilistic Soft Logic

AI-generated keywords: NeuPSL NeSy neuro-symbolic framework integration performance

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors introduce NeuPSL: Neural Probabilistic Soft Logic
  • NeuPSL combines symbolic reasoning with deep neural networks
  • Framework models interface between neural and symbolic representations
  • Demonstrates seamless integration of neural and symbolic parameter learning and inference within NeuPSL
  • Empirical evaluation shows over 30% improvement compared to independent neural network models
  • NeuPSL outperforms existing NeSy approaches by up to 10% on MNIST-Addition task
  • Achieves remarkable speedup of up to 40 times in canonical citation network task
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Connor Pryor, Charles Dickens, Eriq Augustine, Alon Albalak, William Wang, Lise Getoor

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce Neural Probabilistic Soft Logic (NeuPSL), a novel neuro-symbolic (NeSy) framework that unites state-of-the-art symbolic reasoning with the low-level perception of deep neural networks. To model the boundary between neural and symbolic representations, we propose a family of energy-based models, NeSy Energy-Based Models, and show that they are general enough to include NeuPSL and many other NeSy approaches. Using this framework, we show how to seamlessly integrate neural and symbolic parameter learning and inference in NeuPSL. Through an extensive empirical evaluation, we demonstrate the benefits of using NeSy methods, achieving upwards of 30% improvement over independent neural network models. On a well-established NeSy task, MNIST-Addition, NeuPSL demonstrates its joint reasoning capabilities by outperforming existing NeSy approaches by up to 10% in low-data settings. Furthermore, NeuPSL achieves a 5% boost in performance over state-of-the-art NeSy methods in a canonical citation network task with up to a 40 times speed up.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.14268v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "NeuPSL: Neural Probabilistic Soft Logic," authors Connor Pryor, Charles Dickens, Eriq Augustine, Alon Albalak, William Wang, and Lise Getoor introduce a groundbreaking that combines cutting-edge symbolic reasoning with the deep neural network's low-level perception. This innovative approach proposes to model the interface between neural and symbolic representations, showcasing their versatility in encompassing NeuPSL and various other NeSy approaches. By leveraging this framework, the authors demonstrate how neural and symbolic parameter learning and inference can be seamlessly integrated within NeuPSL. Through an extensive empirical evaluation, the study highlights the advantages of employing NeSy methods, showcasing significant improvements of over 30% compared to independent neural network models. Specifically, on the MNIST-Addition task—a well-established NeSy benchmark—NeuPSL showcases its joint reasoning capabilities by surpassing existing NeSy approaches by up to 10% in scenarios with limited data availability. Additionally, in a canonical citation network task while achieving up to a remarkable 40 times speedup. Overall, The results presented in this paper not only demonstrate superior performance but also pave the way for enhanced integration of neural networks and symbolic reasoning in various applications within machine learning and artificial intelligence domains.
Created on 17 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.