Investigating the source of hysteresis in the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve using the multiphase lattice Boltzmann method

AI-generated keywords: Soil-water characteristic curve hysteresis pore-scale numerical simulations multiphase lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) wetting and drying experiments

AI-generated Key Points

  • The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) relates water content to matric suction in unsaturated soil mechanics
  • Hysteresis is observed in SWCC, with factors such as air entrapment and changes in soil fabric proposed as contributors
  • Pore-scale numerical simulations using the multiphase lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) were conducted to investigate hysteresis effects
  • Single-phase and multiphase LBM simulations were performed, considering wetting and drying experiments on granular packings
  • SWCC hysteresis still occurred even when controlling for other factors, indicating an underlying source not accounted for
  • Liquid bridges expanding and joining during wetting play a crucial role in SWCC hysteresis
  • This mechanism is not captured by current proposed factors contributing to hysteresis
  • Pore-scale phenomena are important in understanding SWCC hysteresis and provide insights for future research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Reihaneh Hosseini, Krishna Kumar, Jean-Yves Delenne

arXiv: 2204.07174v1 - DOI (cond-mat.soft)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) is the most fundamental relationship in unsaturated soil mechanics, relating the amount of water in the soil to the corresponding matric suction. From experimental evidence, it is known that SWCC exhibits hysteresis (i.e. wetting/drying path dependence). Various factors have been proposed as contributors to SWCC hysteresis, including air entrapment, contact angle hysteresis, ink-bottle effect, and change of soil fabric due to swelling and shrinkage, however, the significance of their contribution is debated. From our pore-scale numerical simulations, using the multiphase lattice Boltzmann method, we see that even when controlling for all these factors SWCC hysteresis still occurs, indicating that there is some underlying source that is not accounted for in these factors. We find this underlying source by comparing the liquid/gas phase distributions for simulated wetting and drying experiments of 2D and 3D granular packings. We see that during wetting (i.e. pore filling) many liquid bridges expand simultaneously and join together to fill the pores from the smallest to the largest, allowing menisci with larger radii of curvature (lower matric suction). Whereas, during drying (i.e. pore emptying), only the limited existing gas clusters can expand, which become constrained by the size of the pore openings surrounding them and result in menisci with smaller radii of curvature (higher matric suction).

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Apr. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2204.07174v1

The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) is a fundamental relationship in unsaturated soil mechanics that relates the amount of water in the soil to the corresponding matric suction. Hysteresis, which refers to the dependence of the SWCC on the wetting and drying path, has been observed in experimental studies. Several factors have been proposed as contributors to SWCC hysteresis, including air entrapment, contact angle hysteresis, ink-bottle effect, and changes in soil fabric due to swelling and shrinkage. However, the significance of each factor's contribution is still debated. To investigate the underlying source of SWCC hysteresis, pore-scale numerical simulations were conducted using the multiphase lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). The LBM is a numerical method that allows for simulating fluid with multiple phases (liquid and gas) at the pore-scale. While previous studies have explored various mechanisms using LBM, none have specifically examined hysteresis effects. In this study, both single-phase and multiphase LBM simulations were performed. The single-phase LBM discretizes a fluid domain into a grid of equal spacings called lattice nodes. Each lattice node represents a collection of fluid molecules or particles with discrete velocities. Macroscopic quantities such as mass density and fluid velocity can be calculated from particle distribution functions at each lattice node. The multiphase LBM extends this approach to simulate multiple phases or components within a fluid domain. In this case, liquid and gas phases were considered. The simulation involved wetting (pore filling) and drying (pore emptying) experiments on 2D and 3D granular packings. The results showed that even when controlling for factors such as air entrapment, contact angle hysteresis, ink-bottle effect, and changes in soil fabric due to swelling and shrinkage, SWCC hysteresis still occurred. This indicated the presence of an underlying source that was not accounted for by these factors. By comparing the liquid/gas phase distributions during wetting and drying experiments, it was observed that during wetting, many liquid bridges expanded simultaneously and joined together to fill the pores from smallest to largest. This allowed for menisci with larger radii of curvature (lower matric suction). On the other hand, during drying, only existing gas clusters could expand, but they became constrained by the size of the pore openings surrounding them. As a result, menisci with smaller radii of curvature (higher matric suction) were formed. These findings suggest that the simultaneous expansion and joining of liquid bridges during wetting play a crucial role in SWCC hysteresis. This mechanism is not captured by current factors proposed as contributors to hysteresis. The study highlights the importance of considering pore-scale phenomena in understanding SWCC hysteresis and provides valuable insights for future research in unsaturated soil mechanics.
Created on 13 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.