TraHGR: Transformer for Hand Gesture Recognition via ElectroMyography

AI-generated keywords: Deep learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Deep learning-based Hand Gesture Recognition (HGR) via surface Electromyogram (sEMG) signals is promising for myoelectric-controlled prostheses.
  • Existing deep learning approaches struggle with generalization in changing scenarios.
  • The TraHGR hybrid framework leverages hybrid models and transformers for improved performance.
  • TraHGR architecture includes two parallel paths and a fusion center for robustness across scenarios.
  • Evaluation on Ninapro dataset (DB2) shows recognition accuracies of 86.18% on 49 gestures, outperforming state-of-the-art results.
  • Analysis of different window sizes (200ms, 150ms, 100ms) impacts model performance and complexity.
  • Statistical analysis demonstrates significant accuracy improvements with TraHGR for 200ms window size.
  • Position-wise cosine similarity analysis highlights the effectiveness of TraHGR in capturing similarities between embeddings.
  • Comparison table showcases TraHGR's superiority over previous DNN approaches in terms of performance across window sizes and gesture subsets within the DB2 dataset.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Soheil Zabihi, Elahe Rahimian, Amir Asif, Arash Mohammadi

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Deep learning-based Hand Gesture Recognition (HGR) via surface Electromyogram (sEMG) signals has recently shown significant potential for development of advanced myoelectric-controlled prosthesis. Existing deep learning approaches, typically, include only one model as such can hardly maintain acceptable generalization performance in changing scenarios. In this paper, we aim to address this challenge by capitalizing on the recent advances of hybrid models and transformers. In other words, we propose a hybrid framework based on the transformer architecture, which is a relatively new and revolutionizing deep learning model. The proposed hybrid architecture, referred to as the Transformer for Hand Gesture Recognition (TraHGR), consists of two parallel paths followed by a linear layer that acts as a fusion center to integrate the advantage of each module and provide robustness over different scenarios. We evaluated the proposed architecture TraHGR based on the commonly used second Ninapro dataset, referred to as the DB2. The sEMG signals in the DB2 dataset are measured in the real-life conditions from 40 healthy users, each performing 49 gestures. We have conducted extensive set of experiments to test and validate the proposed TraHGR architecture, and have compared its achievable accuracy with more than five recently proposed HGR classification algorithms over the same dataset. We have also compared the results of the proposed TraHGR architecture with each individual path and demonstrated the distinguishing power of the proposed hybrid architecture. The recognition accuracies of the proposed TraHGR architecture are 86.18%, 88.91%, 81.44%, and 93.84%, which are 2.48%, 5.12%, 8.82%, and 4.30% higher than the state-ofthe-art performance for DB2 (49 gestures), DB2-B (17 gestures), DB2-C (23 gestures), and DB2-D (9 gestures), respectively.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.16336v2

, , , , Deep learning-based Hand Gesture Recognition (HGR) via surface Electromyogram (sEMG) signals has shown significant potential for the development of advanced myoelectric-controlled prostheses. However, existing deep learning approaches often struggle to maintain acceptable generalization performance in changing scenarios. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a hybrid framework called the Transformer for Hand Gesture Recognition (TraHGR), which leverages recent advances in hybrid models and transformers. The TraHGR architecture consists of two parallel paths followed by a fusion center to integrate the advantages of each module and provide robustness across different scenarios. The proposed model was evaluated on the second Ninapro dataset (DB2), which includes sEMG signals from 40 healthy users performing 49 gestures in real-life conditions. The paper analyzes the effect of different window sizes (200ms, 150ms, and 100ms) on overall performance and model complexity. TraHGR achieves recognition accuracies of 86.18% on DB2 (49 gestures), 88.91% on DB2-B (17 gestures), 81.44% on DB2-C (23 gestures), and 93.84% on DB2-D (9 gestures). These results outperform state-of-the-art performance for each subset of gestures in the dataset. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare TraHGR with other proposed architectures, showing statistically significant improvements in accuracy for window sizes of 200ms. Position-wise cosine similarity analysis further demonstrates the effectiveness of TraHGR in capturing similarities between different embeddings. A comparison table showcases the superiority of TraHGR over previous DNN approaches, highlighting its superior performance across different window sizes and gesture subsets within the DB2 dataset. In conclusion, the proposed TraHGR architecture offers a novel approach to hand gesture recognition using sEMG signals, achieving high accuracy rates across various scenarios and outperforming existing methodologies in the field.
Created on 19 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.