When Gamification Spoils Your Learning: A Qualitative Case Study of Gamification Misuse in a Language-Learning App

AI-generated keywords: Gamification Misuse Learning Apps Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Learning at Scale (L@S) Duolingo

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Gamification misuse occurs when users become too fixated on game elements and get distracted from the actual learning process
  • Limited research on gamification misuse in literature
  • Study conducted qualitative research using content analysis of Duolingo forums and interviews with 15 international Duolingo users
  • Ramifications of gamification misuse on user learning, well-being, and ethics
  • Common reasons for gamification misuse: competitiveness, overindulgence in playfulness, herding behavior
  • Practical suggestions for designers to prevent or mitigate gamification misuse in future designs of learning apps
  • Insights into how users perceive and engage with game elements in Duolingo
  • Findings can inform future design decisions for learning apps to ensure effective use of gamification without compromising meaningful learning experiences.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Reza Hadi Mogavi, Bingcan Guo, Yuanhao Zhang, Ehsan-Ul Haq, Pan Hui, Xiaojuan Ma

Accepted in the Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '22)

Abstract: More and more learning apps like Duolingo are using some form of gamification (e.g., badges, points, and leaderboards) to enhance user learning. However, they are not always successful. Gamification misuse is a phenomenon that occurs when users become too fixated on gamification and get distracted from learning. This undesirable phenomenon wastes users' precious time and negatively impacts their learning performance. However, there has been little research in the literature to understand gamification misuse and inform future gamification designs. Therefore, this paper aims to fill this knowledge gap by conducting the first extensive qualitative research on gamification misuse in a popular learning app called Duolingo. Duolingo is currently the world's most downloaded learning app used to learn languages. This study consists of two phases: (I) a content analysis of data from Duolingo forums (from the past nine years) and (II) semi-structured interviews with 15 international Duolingo users. Our research contributes to the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Learning at Scale (L@S) research communities in three ways: (1) elaborating the ramifications of gamification misuse on user learning, well-being, and ethics, (2) identifying the most common reasons for gamification misuse (e.g., competitiveness, overindulgence in playfulness, and herding), and (3) providing designers with practical suggestions to prevent (or mitigate) the occurrence of gamification misuse in their future designs of gamified learning apps.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Mar. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.16175v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "When Gamification Spoils Your Learning: A Qualitative Case Study of Gamification Misuse in a Language-Learning App" by Reza Hadi Mogavi, Bingcan Guo, Yuanhao Zhang, Ehsan-Ul Haq, Pan Hui, and Xiaojuan Ma explores the phenomenon of gamification misuse in learning apps like Duolingo. While gamification has been widely used to enhance user learning experiences, it is not always successful. Gamification misuse occurs when users become too fixated on the game elements and get distracted from the actual learning process which can lead to wasted time and negatively impact learning performance. Despite its significance, there has been limited research on gamification misuse in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to fill this knowledge gap by conducting an extensive qualitative research using two phases: a content analysis of data from Duolingo forums over the past nine years and semi-structured interviews with 15 international Duolingo users. The research contributes to the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Learning at Scale (L@S) research communities in three ways. Firstly, it elaborates on the ramifications of gamification misuse on user learning, well-being, and ethics. Secondly, it identifies the most common reasons for gamification misuse such as competitiveness, overindulgence in playfulness, and herding behavior. Lastly, it provides practical suggestions for designers to prevent or mitigate gamification misuse in future designs of gamified learning apps. By focusing specifically on Duolingo as a popular language-learning app that utilizes gamification techniques extensively, this study provides valuable insights into how users perceive and engage with these game elements. The findings can inform future design decisions for learning apps to ensure that gamification is used effectively without compromising the primary goal of facilitating meaningful learning experiences.
Created on 01 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.