Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2203.15135v1

, , , , In their work titled "Filler Word Detection and Classification: A Dataset and Benchmark," authors Ge Zhu, Juan-Pablo Caceres, and Justin Salamon address the issue of identifying and categorizing filler words like 'uh' or 'um' in speech recordings. These filler words are commonly used as pauses during speech, making their removal a tedious task in media editing. The authors highlight the lack of research in this area due to the absence of a comprehensive dataset with annotated filler words for training and evaluation. To bridge this gap, the authors introduce a new speech dataset called PodcastFillers, containing 35K annotated filler words along with 50K annotations of other common sounds found in podcasts such as breaths, laughter, and word repetitions. They propose a pipeline that combines Voice Activity Detection (VAD) and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) to identify potential filler candidates and a classifier to differentiate between different types of filler words. The authors evaluate their pipeline on PodcastFillers, comparing it against several baseline methods and conducting a detailed ablation study to assess the impact of using ASR compared to transcription-free approaches like keyword spotting. Their results demonstrate that leveraging ASR significantly improves detection accuracy, outperforming keyword spotting techniques. The proposed pipeline achieves state-of-the-art results in detecting and classifying filler words. By making PodcastFillers publicly available, the authors aim to establish a benchmark for future research in this field. Their work not only contributes to enhancing media editing processes by automating filler word detection but also sheds light on the importance of utilizing ASR technology for improved performance in speech analysis tasks. This study serves as a valuable resource for researchers interested in developing more efficient methods for identifying and managing filler words in audio recordings.

• - Authors Ge Zhu, Juan-Pablo Caceres, and Justin Salamon address identifying and categorizing filler words in speech recordings
• - Introduce PodcastFillers dataset with 35K annotated filler words and 50K annotations of other common sounds in podcasts
• - Propose a pipeline combining Voice Activity Detection (VAD) and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for identifying filler candidates
• - Evaluate pipeline on PodcastFillers, showing ASR significantly improves detection accuracy
• - Achieve state-of-the-art results in detecting and classifying filler words
• - Make PodcastFillers publicly available to establish a benchmark for future research

Summary1. Authors Ge Zhu, Juan-Pablo Caceres, and Justin Salamon studied finding and sorting filler words in speech recordings. 2. They created a dataset called PodcastFillers with 35K marked filler words and 50K other common sounds from podcasts. 3. They suggested using Voice Activity Detection (VAD) and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) together to find filler word possibilities. 4. By testing their method on PodcastFillers, they found that ASR greatly improved the accuracy of detecting fillers. 5. Their work set a new standard for spotting and categorizing filler words by making PodcastFillers available for others to use. Definitions- Authors: People who write books or research papers. - Filler words: Words like "um," "uh," or "like" used in speech when someone is thinking or hesitating. - Dataset: A collection of data used for analysis or research. - Voice Activity Detection (VAD): Technology that identifies when someone is speaking in an audio recording. - Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR): Software that converts spoken language into text automatically. - State-of-the-art: The most advanced or best available at a given time. - Benchmark: A standard point of reference used for comparison in experiments or research.

Introduction

Filler words are a common occurrence in everyday speech, often used as pauses or placeholders while we gather our thoughts. These words, such as 'uh' or 'um', may seem insignificant but can add up to significant amounts of time in media recordings. As a result, removing filler words has become an essential task in media editing processes. However, this task is tedious and time-consuming, highlighting the need for automated methods to detect and remove filler words. In their research paper titled "Filler Word Detection and Classification: A Dataset and Benchmark," authors Ge Zhu, Juan-Pablo Caceres, and Justin Salamon address this issue by introducing a new dataset called PodcastFillers along with a pipeline for detecting and classifying filler words. This article will provide a detailed overview of their work.

The Need for Research on Filler Words

Despite the prevalence of filler words in speech recordings, there has been limited research on identifying and categorizing them. One reason for this is the lack of comprehensive datasets with annotated filler words that can be used for training and evaluation purposes. Existing datasets either have limited annotations or focus on specific types of fillers like laughter or breaths. The absence of a benchmark dataset makes it challenging to compare different approaches for detecting filler words accurately. Moreover, most studies rely on keyword spotting techniques rather than leveraging more advanced technologies like Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Therefore, there is a need for research that utilizes ASR technology to improve detection accuracy.

The PodcastFillers Dataset

To address these gaps in research, Zhu et al. introduce PodcastFillers – a new dataset containing 35K annotated filler word instances from over 500 hours of podcast audio recordings. The dataset also includes annotations for other common sounds found in podcasts such as breaths, laughter, word repetitions etc., making it suitable not only for filler word detection but also for other speech analysis tasks. The authors collected the dataset by manually annotating filler words in podcast recordings from various sources, including popular podcasts and online repositories. They ensured a diverse range of speakers, accents, and topics to make the dataset representative of real-world scenarios. The annotations were verified by multiple annotators to ensure accuracy.

The Proposed Pipeline

Zhu et al.'s pipeline consists of two main components – Voice Activity Detection (VAD) and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). VAD is used to identify potential filler candidates by detecting silence segments in audio recordings. These segments are then passed through an ASR system, which transcribes them into text. The final step involves using a classifier to differentiate between different types of fillers based on their transcription. To train the classifier, the authors use PodcastFillers along with existing datasets like LibriSpeech and CommonVoice. They compare several baseline methods such as keyword spotting and VAD-only approaches against their proposed pipeline to evaluate its performance.

Results and Evaluation

The results demonstrate that leveraging ASR significantly improves detection accuracy compared to keyword spotting techniques. The proposed pipeline achieves state-of-the-art results in detecting and classifying filler words, outperforming all baseline methods. Additionally, the authors conduct an ablation study to assess the impact of using ASR compared to transcription-free approaches like keyword spotting.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Zhu et al.'s work makes significant contributions towards automating filler word detection in speech recordings. By introducing PodcastFillers – a comprehensive dataset with annotated filler words – they provide a benchmark for future research in this field. Their proposed pipeline leverages advanced technologies like ASR to achieve state-of-the-art results in identifying and categorizing fillers accurately. This study not only enhances media editing processes but also highlights the importance of utilizing ASR technology for improved performance in speech analysis tasks.