Infrared Finite Scattering Theory in Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Infrared (IR) divergences in scattering theory involving massless fields are linked to the memory effect, where states with memory do not fit into the standard Fock space representation.
- Attempting to fit states with memory into the conventional Fock space framework leads to IR divergences.
- Imposing an IR cutoff in collider physics to address IR divergences falls short in treating memory as a quantum observable and becomes inadequate when considering the S-matrix as fundamental in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and quantum gravity.
- To establish a well-defined S-matrix, it is crucial to define in/out Hilbert spaces incorporating memory.
- Faddeev and Kulish (FK) proposed a construction for Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) pairing momentum states of charged particles with memory states of the electromagnetic field, but collinear divergences render these dressed states unphysical in massless QED.
- The application of FK construction encounters challenges in Yang-Mills theory due to contributions from "soft particles" undermining its validity.
- An analogous FK construction in quantum gravity aiming to produce a Hilbert space comprising eigenstates of supertranslation charges at spatial infinity fails due to the absence of eigenstates aside from the vacuum state.
- Exploring alternatives to FK constructions reveals their inefficacy, leading authors to advocate for an algebraic viewpoint over forcing in/out states into fixed Hilbert spaces when addressing scattering at a fundamental level.
Authors: Kartik Prabhu, Gautam Satishchandran, Robert M. Wald
Abstract: Infrared (IR) divergences arise in scattering theory with massless fields and are manifestations of the memory effect. There is nothing singular about states with memory, but they do not lie in the standard Fock space. IR divergences are artifacts of trying to represent states with memory in the standard Fock space. For collider physics, one can impose an IR cutoff and calculate inclusive quantities. But, this approach cannot treat memory as a quantum observable and is highly unsatisfactory if one views the S-matrix as fundamental in QFT and quantum gravity, since the S-matrix is undefined. For a well-defined S-matrix, it is necessary to define in/out Hilbert spaces with memory. Such a construction was given by Faddeev and Kulish (FK) for QED. Their construction "dresses" momentum states of the charged particles by pairing them with memory states of the electromagnetic field to produce states of vanishing large gauge charges at spatial infinity. However, in massless QED, due to collinear divergences, the "dressing" has an infinite energy flux so these states are unphysical. In Yang-Mills theory the "soft particles" used for dressing also contribute to the current flux, invalidating the FK procedure. In quantum gravity, the analogous FK construction would attempt to produce a Hilbert space of eigenstates of supertranslation charges at spatial infinity. However, we prove that there are no eigenstates of supertranslation charges except the vacuum. Thus, the FK construction fails in quantum gravity. We investigate some alternatives to FK constructions but find that these also do not work. We believe that to treat scattering at a fundamental level in quantum gravity -- as well as in massless QED and YM theory -- it is necessary to take an algebraic viewpoint rather than shoehorn the in/out states into some fixed Hilbert space. We outline the framework of such an IR finite scattering theory.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.