Sustainable Development Goal Target Interactions in the Philippines: A Two-Method Approach
Authors: Vena Pearl Bongolan, Spencer C. Soria, Roselle Leah K. Rivera
Abstract: In 2015, the United Nations adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with 169 targets for transformation toward a more sustainable future by 2030. This study seeks to evaluate and analyze SDG target interactions in the Philippines to resolve conflicting targets, and prioritize targets that reinforce others and have no conflicts. To evaluate all 14196 target interactions, two methods are employed. First, experts with over five years of SDG-related experience evaluated interactions using a 7-point scale. Second, a non-parametric Spearman rank correlation is used on official indicator data with resulting coefficients serving as interaction scores. Interaction scores are then coded as synergies (interact positively), trade-offs (negatively) or non-classified (neutrally). Targets are also modelled as nodes and interactions as edges in graphs presented in sdginteractions.herokuapp.com. Results from the two methods were synthesized to formulate recommendations for concerned parties. This includes resolving negative intra-goal target interactions involving targets 3.1 'Reduce maternal mortality', 3.6 'Reduce road injuries and deaths', and 3.7 'Universal access to sexual and reproductive care, family planning, and education'. Ugly targets (at least one negative interaction) including target 3.6, 3.7, and 8.2 'Diversify, innovate, and upgrade for economic productivity' need to be resolved. Targets that reinforce their corresponding SDGs should be prioritized, including 1.1 'Eradicate extreme poverty', 4.2 'Equal access to quality pre-primary education', 6.2 'End open defecation and provide access to sanitation and hygiene', 8.1 'Sustainable economic growth', and 9.4 'Upgrade all industries and infrastructures for sustainability'. Beautiful targets (no negative interactions) should also be prioritized, including target 8.5 and 17.5 'Invest in least developed countries'.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.