Iterated Belief Change, Computationally
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Belief change is the process of updating or revising one's beliefs based on new information or evidence.
- It is crucial in various fields, including artificial intelligence and decision-making systems.
- Single-step belief change has been extensively studied, but understanding how beliefs evolve over multiple iterations is an active area of research.
- In Iterated Belief Change, researchers investigate principles for the dynamics of beliefs over numerous subsequent belief changes.
- The paper "Iterated Belief Change, Computationally" by Kai Sauerwald and Christoph Beierle explores the connection between iterated belief change and computation.
- The authors demonstrate that iterative belief revision is Turing complete, even when considering widely accepted principles such as the Darwiche-Pearl postulates for iterated revision.
- Connecting iterated belief change to computation opens up new avenues for exploring the relationship between beliefs and algorithms.
- This research has implications for AI systems, philosophy, cognitive science, and epistemology.
- The paper contributes to the growing knowledge in Iterated Belief Change by providing insights into its connection with computation.
Authors: Kai Sauerwald, Christoph Beierle
Abstract: Iterated Belief Change is the research area that investigates principles for the dynamics of beliefs over (possibly unlimited) many subsequent belief changes. In this paper, we demonstrate how iterated belief change is connected to computation. In particular, we show that iterative belief revision is Turing complete, even under the condition that broadly accepted principles like the Darwiche-Pearl postulates for iterated revision hold.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.