Millisecond speed deep learning based proton dose calculation with Monte Carlo accuracy
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Radiotherapy field is evolving with a demand for next-generation adaptive workflows
- Accurate simulation of particle transport in sub-second times is challenging
- Current analytical pencil beam algorithms and stochastic Monte Carlo methods are not precise enough for advanced workflows
- Authors propose a novel data-driven millisecond speed dose calculation algorithm called DoTA
- DoTA accurately predicts dose deposited by proton pencil beams for arbitrary energies and patient geometries
- Protons have forward-scattering nature, 3D particle transport modeled as sequence of 2D geometries in beam's eye view
- DoTA combines convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer self-attention backbone to extract spatial features and facilitate information routing
- Algorithm trained using low noise MC simulations of proton beamlets from various geometries
- DoTA predicts beamlet doses in just 5 milliseconds with gamma pass rate of 99.37% compared to ground truth MC calculations
- DoTA offers MC accuracy that is 100 times faster than PBAs for pencil beams
- Can calculate full treatment plan doses in 10 to 15 seconds with outstanding gamma pass rate of 99.70%
- Represents new state-of-the-art in data-driven dose calculation suitable for sub-second calculations and adaptive treatments
- Straightforward implementation could offer benefits to other steps of radiotherapy workflow or other treatment modalities
Authors: Oscar Pastor-Serrano, Zoltán Perkó
Abstract: Next generation online and real-time adaptive radiotherapy workflows require precise particle transport simulations in sub-second times, which is unfeasible with current analytical pencil beam algorithms (PBA) or stochastic Monte Carlo (MC) methods. We present a data-driven millisecond speed dose calculation algorithm (DoTA) accurately predicting the dose deposited by mono-energetic proton pencil beams for arbitrary energies and patient geometries. Given the forward-scattering nature of protons, we frame 3D particle transport as modeling a sequence of 2D geometries in the beam's eye view. DoTA combines convolutional neural networks extracting spatial features (e.g., tissue and density contrasts) with a transformer self-attention backbone that routes information between the sequence of geometry slices and a vector representing the beam's energy, and is trained to predict low noise MC simulations of proton beamlets using 80,000 different head and neck, lung, and prostate geometries. Predicting beamlet doses in 5 ms with a very high gamma pass rate of 99.37% (1%, 3 mm) compared to the ground truth MC calculations, DoTA significantly improves upon analytical pencil beam algorithms both in precision and speed. Offering MC accuracy 100 times faster than PBAs for pencil beams, our model calculates full treatment plan doses in 10 to 15 s depending on the number of beamlets, achieving a 99.70% (2%, 2 mm) gamma pass rate across 9 test patients. Outperforming all previous analytical pencil beam and deep learning based approaches, DoTA represents a new state of the art in data-driven dose calculation and can directly compete with the speed of even commercial GPU MC approaches. Providing the sub-second speed required for adaptive treatments, straightforward implementations could offer similar benefits to other steps of the radiotherapy workflow or other modalities such as helium or carbon treatments.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.