Decision Models for Selecting Patterns and Strategies in Microservices Systems and their Evaluation by Practitioners

AI-generated keywords: Microservices Architecture Patterns Strategies Decision-making

AI-generated Key Points

  • Extensive search process identified 211 patterns and strategies from scientific sources and 174 from grey literature in four key MSA design areas
  • Common naming conventions established to streamline identification process, resulting in final selection of 7 distinct patterns and strategies for application decomposition
  • Decision models developed based on these patterns and strategies to aid practitioners in making informed choices aligned with quality attributes crucial for microservices systems
  • Empirical evaluations conducted with 24 microservices practitioners to assess effectiveness of decision models
  • Paper structured into sections detailing research methodology, specifics of decision models, evaluation outcomes, threats to validity considerations, related work analysis, and concluding remarks with implications for future research directions
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Muhammad Waseem, Peng Liang, Aakash Ahmad, Mojtaba Shahin, Arif Ali Khan, Gastón Márquez

The 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) SEIP Track. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2110.03889
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Researchers and practitioners have recently proposed many Microservices Architecture (MSA) patterns and strategies covering various aspects of microservices system life cycle, such as service design and security. However, selecting and implementing these patterns and strategies can entail various challenges for microservices practitioners. To this end, this study proposes decision models for selecting patterns and strategies covering four MSA design areas: application decomposition into microservices, microservices security, microservices communication, and service discovery. We used peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the patterns, strategies, and quality attributes for creating these decision models. To evaluate the familiarity, understandability, completeness, and usefulness of the decision models, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 microservices practitioners from 12 countries across five continents. Our evaluation results show that the practitioners found the decision models as an effective guide to select microservices patterns and strategies.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Jan. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2201.05825v1

This study addresses challenges in selecting and implementing Microservices Architecture (MSA) patterns and strategies. Through an extensive search process of 38 scientific studies and 22 grey literature sources, a total of 211 patterns and strategies from scientific sources and 174 from grey literature were identified in four key MSA design areas. Common naming conventions were established to streamline the identification process, resulting in the final selection of 7 distinct patterns and strategies for application decomposition. Decision models were then developed based on these patterns and strategies to aid practitioners in making informed choices aligned with quality attributes crucial for microservices systems. Empirical evaluations with 24 microservices practitioners were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the decision models. The paper is structured into sections detailing research methodology, specifics of the decision models, evaluation outcomes, threats to validity considerations, related work analysis, and concluding remarks with implications for future research directions. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing decision-making processes related to microservices architecture through comprehensive pattern-based approaches supported by practitioner feedback.
Created on 29 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.