Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2201.01392v2

In the study titled "Stablecoins: Survivorship, Transactions Costs and Exchange Microstructure" by Bruce Mizrach, the author explores the stability of stablecoins and their transaction costs. The findings reveal that stablecoins are not as stable as expected, even though cash collateralized coins tend to be more stable than tokens designed to be stable. USD Coin, Tether, and Dai are identified as having the largest market shares on the Ethereum blockchain, with an average velocity nearly three times higher than M1. The study also highlights that centralized and decentralized exchanges play a crucial role in the stability of stablecoins. These exchanges are not only the most active nodes but also hold significant amounts of stablecoin assets. Additionally, it is noted that four out of the top ten tokens have Herfindahl indices higher than those of the U.S. banking system. Examining transaction costs, the research reveals that median gas fees for Tether have increased by over twelve times in the last two years while USD Coin has seen an increase of nearly twenty times. However, transactions under $50,000 can generally be conducted more cost-effectively off-chain. Furthermore, it is observed that Tether experiences a substantial 24-hour exchange turnover of nearly $60 billion which is comparable to daily trading at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and eight times higher than daily flow in money market mutual funds. The narrow bid-ask spreads and depth in Tether's market have attracted high-frequency trading (HFT) participation approaching 50%. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into stablecoins' stability and transaction costs within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It sheds light on their market shares; velocity compared to traditional monetary aggregates like M1; involvement of exchanges as key players in maintaining stability; significant increases in gas fees over time for certain stablecoins; as well as narrow bid-ask spreads and depth which have attracted high levels of HFT participation.

• - Stablecoins are not as stable as expected, with cash collateralized coins being more stable than tokens designed to be stable.
• - USD Coin, Tether, and Dai have the largest market shares on the Ethereum blockchain.
• - Centralized and decentralized exchanges play a crucial role in the stability of stablecoins.
• - Four out of the top ten tokens have higher Herfindahl indices than the U.S. banking system.
• - Median gas fees for Tether have increased by over twelve times in the last two years, while USD Coin has seen an increase of nearly twenty times.
• - Transactions under $50,000 can generally be conducted more cost-effectively off-chain.
• - Tether experiences a substantial 24-hour exchange turnover of nearly $60 billion, comparable to daily trading at NYSE and eight times higher than daily flow in money market mutual funds.
• - Tether's market has attracted high-frequency trading (HFT) participation approaching 50%.

Stablecoins are a type of digital money that is supposed to stay the same value, but some are not very stable. Cash collateralized coins are more stable than other types of stablecoins. USD Coin, Tether, and Dai are the most popular stablecoins on a platform called Ethereum. There are two types of places where you can trade stablecoins: centralized exchanges and decentralized exchanges. These places help keep stablecoins stable. Some of the top ten stablecoins have more control in one place than big banks in the United States. The fees for using Tether and USD Coin have gone up a lot in the past two years. If you want to do small transactions under $50,000, it's usually cheaper to do them outside of the main system. Tether is used a lot for trading, almost as much as people trade on the New York Stock Exchange. It's also used a lot by high-frequency traders."

Stablecoins: Survivorship, Transactions Costs and Exchange Microstructure

In the study titled "Stablecoins: Survivorship, Transactions Costs and Exchange Microstructure" by Bruce Mizrach, the author explores the stability of stablecoins and their transaction costs. The findings reveal that stablecoins are not as stable as expected, even though cash collateralized coins tend to be more stable than tokens designed to be stable. USD Coin, Tether, and Dai are identified as having the largest market shares on the Ethereum blockchain with an average velocity nearly three times higher than M1.

Exchanges Play a Crucial Role in Stability

The study also highlights that centralized and decentralized exchanges play a crucial role in the stability of stablecoins. These exchanges are not only the most active nodes but also hold significant amounts of stablecoin assets. Additionally, it is noted that four out of the top ten tokens have Herfindahl indices higher than those of the U.S. banking system.

Transaction Costs Have Increased Over Time

Examining transaction costs, the research reveals that median gas fees for Tether have increased by over twelve times in the last two years while USD Coin has seen an increase of nearly twenty times. However, transactions under $50,000 can generally be conducted more cost-effectively off-chain.

Tether Experiences Significant 24-Hour Exchange Turnover

Furthermore, it is observed that Tether experiences a substantial 24-hour exchange turnover of nearly $60 billion which is comparable to daily trading at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and eight times higher than daily flow in money market mutual funds. The narrow bid-ask spreads and depth in Tether's market have attracted high-frequency trading (HFT) participation approaching 50%.

Conclusion

Overall, this study provides valuable insights into stablecoins' stability and transaction costs within cryptocurrency ecosystem It sheds light on their market shares; velocity compared to traditional monetary aggregates like M1; involvement of exchanges as key players in maintaining stability; significant increases in gas fees over time for certain stablecoins; as well as narrow bid-ask spreads and depth which have attracted high levels of HFT participation