Intelligent Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method Combining Mixed Input and Hybrid CNN-MLP model

AI-generated keywords: Rolling Bearings

AI-generated Key Points

  • Rolling bearings are widely used in industrial machines and their deterioration can lead to machinery failure.
  • AI-based methods, specifically hybrid neural network (NN)-based approaches, are commonly used to diagnose the condition of rolling bearings.
  • Raw data is collected from accelerometers mounted on the machine housing for diagnosis.
  • The effectiveness of each signal in diagnosing bearing defects depends on the location of the accelerometer.
  • A novel hybrid CNN-MLP model-based diagnostic method is proposed for rolling bearing diagnostics, which combines mixed input data and wireless acceleration sensor data.
  • The hybrid CNN-MLP model outperforms both CNN and MLP models individually, achieving a high detection accuracy rate of 99.6% for bearing faults.
  • Various analysis techniques are commonly used in fault recognition for rolling bearings, including time-domain analysis, frequency-domain analysis, and time-frequency analysis.
  • Extracted features from these analyses serve as inputs to machine learning techniques for fault recognition purposes.
  • Different machine learning tools have been utilized in previous studies, including k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) method, naive Bayes algorithm, Bayes network algorithm, support vector machine approach, random forests algorithm, and artificial neural networks.
  • Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have shown great potential in mechanical fault diagnosis, particularly in bearing fault diagnosis.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: V. Sinitsin, O. Ibryaeva, V. Sakovskaya, V. Eremeeva

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Rolling bearings are one of the most widely used bearings in industrial machines. Deterioration in the condition of rolling bearings can result in the total failure of rotating machinery. AI-based methods are widely applied in the diagnosis of rolling bearings. Hybrid NN-based methods have been shown to achieve the best diagnosis results. Typically, raw data is generated from accelerometers mounted on the machine housing. However, the diagnostic utility of each signal is highly dependent on the location of the corresponding accelerometer. This paper proposes a novel hybrid CNN-MLP model-based diagnostic method which combines mixed input to perform rolling bearing diagnostics. The method successfully detects and localizes bearing defects using acceleration data from a shaft-mounted wireless acceleration sensor. The experimental results show that the hybrid model is superior to the CNN and MLP models operating separately, and can deliver a high detection accuracy of 99,6% for the bearing faults compared to 98% for CNN and 81% for MLP models.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.08673v1

Rolling bearings are widely used in industrial machines, and their deterioration can lead to the failure of rotating machinery. To diagnose the condition of rolling bearings, AI-based methods are commonly employed. Among these methods, hybrid neural network (NN)-based approaches have been found to achieve the best diagnosis results. Typically, raw data is collected from accelerometers mounted on the machine housing. However, the effectiveness of each signal in diagnosing bearing defects depends heavily on the location of the corresponding accelerometer. In this study, a novel hybrid CNN-MLP model-based diagnostic method is proposed for rolling bearing diagnostics. This method combines mixed input data to detect and localize bearing defects using acceleration data from a shaft-mounted wireless acceleration sensor. The researchers compared the performance of the hybrid model with that of CNN and MLP models operating separately. The experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid CNN-MLP model outperforms both CNN and MLP models individually. It achieves a high detection accuracy rate of 99.6% for bearing faults, compared to 98% for CNN models and 81% for MLP models. In terms of methodology, various analysis techniques are commonly used in fault recognition for rolling bearings. Time-domain analysis calculates statistical parameters such as RMS and kurtosis, while frequency-domain analysis isolates key frequency components using tools like fast Fourier transform (FFT). Time-frequency analysis extends frequency-domain analysis to non-stationary vibration signals through methods like short-term Fourier transform, wavelet transform, empirical mode decomposition (EMD), or Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT). For fault recognition purposes, extracted features from these analyses serve as inputs to machine learning techniques. Different machine learning tools have been utilized in previous studies, including k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) method, naive Bayes algorithm, Bayes network algorithm, support vector machine approach, random forests algorithm, and artificial neural networks. Deep neural networks have shown great potential in mechanical fault diagnosis, with convolutional neural networks (CNN) being particularly effective in bearing fault diagnosis. Researchers have successfully trained one-dimensional CNN models using raw vibration signals.
Created on 04 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.