The impact of station far sidelobes on EoR/CD power spectra

AI-generated keywords: Sidelobes SKA1-Low Dipole Antennas EoR CD

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on impact of station far sidelobes on Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) and Cosmic Dawn (CD) power spectra in the context of dipole antennas for SKA1-Low
  • Stations consist of 256 elements spread over a 38~m diameter area
  • Effect of residual unsubtracted sources located well outside the main beam investigated for different numbers of unique station configurations
  • Beam sidelobes imprint power that renders cosmological signal unobservable unless compact sources are subtracted beyond \theta_Z=30 degrees from zenith
  • Station apodization may be necessary to control far sidelobes effectively
  • Array with four unique station configurations (N_b=4) deemed sufficient, minimal improvement seen when increasing to eight (N_b=8)
  • Beam sidelobe level contributes significantly to excess power in EoR window, while beam chromaticity plays a less significant role
  • To access relevant modes of power spectrum at z=8.5 in EoR, necessary to subtract sources above 200~mJy out to \theta_Z=45 degrees
  • Study highlights importance of considering station far sidelobes and their impact on cosmological signal observations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Cathryn M. Trott

arXiv: 2112.00904v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
20 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in SPIE JATIS SKA Special Edition

Abstract: Stations of dipole antennas for SKA1-Low will comprise 256 elements spread over an area with a diameter of 38~m. We consider the effect of residual unsubtracted sources well outside of the main beam for differing numbers of unique station configurations, in the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) and the Cosmic Dawn (CD), both in simulation and with theoretical considerations. We find that beam sidelobes imprint power that renders the cosmological signal unobservable over a range of scales unless compact sources are subtracted beyond \theta_Z=30 degrees from zenith, and that station apodization will likely be required to control far sidelobes. An array with N_b=4 unique station configurations is sufficient to reduce the contamination, with an increase to N_b=8 showing little improvement. Comparison with an achromatic Airy disk beam model shows that beam sidelobe level is the main contributor to excess power in the EoR window, and beam chromaticity is less relevant. In the EoR, z=8.5, subtracting sources above 200~mJy out to \theta_Z=45 degrees, will be required to access relevant modes of the power spectrum.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Dec. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.00904v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study focuses on the impact of station far sidelobes on Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) and Cosmic Dawn (CD) power spectra in the context of dipole antennas for SKA1-Low. The stations consist of 256 elements spread over a 38~m diameter area. The researchers investigate the effect of residual unsubtracted sources located well outside the main beam for different numbers of unique station configurations. Using simulations and theoretical considerations, the authors find that beam sidelobes imprint power that renders the cosmological signal unobservable across various scales unless compact sources are subtracted beyond a certain angle from zenith (\theta_Z=30 degrees). They also suggest that station apodization may be necessary to control far sidelobes effectively. To reduce contamination, an array with four unique station configurations (N_b=4) is deemed sufficient, as increasing it to eight (N_b=8) shows minimal improvement. Comparing their findings with an achromatic Airy disk beam model, they conclude that beam sidelobe level contributes significantly to excess power in the EoR window, while beam chromaticity plays a less significant role. In order to access relevant modes of the power spectrum at z=8.5 in the EoR, it will be necessary to subtract sources above 200~mJy out to \theta_Z=45 degrees. This study highlights the importance of considering station far sidelobes and their impact on cosmological signal observations; it provides insights into what is required for reducing contamination and accessing relevant modes in both EoR and CD scenarios using dipole antennas for SKA1-Low.
Created on 20 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.