Symptoms of depersonalisation/derealisation disorder as measured by brain electrical activity: A systematic review
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder (DPD) is a dissociative disorder affecting 1-2% of the population.
- It takes an average of 7-12 years to receive an accurate diagnosis for DPD due to lack of understanding and awareness.
- A systematic review by Abbas Salami, Javier Andreu-Perez, and Helge Gillmeister focused on exploring neural correlates of core DPD symptoms using electrophysiological techniques.
- The research covered publications from 1992 to 2020 and aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of EEG power spectrum, event-related potentials (ERPs), vestibular and heartbeat evoked potentials as potential biomarkers for studying DPD symptoms.
- Acute anxiety or trauma-induced disruptions in integrating interoceptive and exteroceptive signals play a significant role in the development of DPD symptoms.
- Further research utilizing analysis methods considering signal integration is needed to address diagnostic challenges associated with DPD.
- Tools for prospective studies focusing on electrophysiological biomarkers specific to DPD are suggested, emphasizing the urgent need to explore their diagnostic potential effectively.
Authors: Abbas Salami, Javier Andreu-Perez, Helge Gillmeister
Abstract: Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder (DPD) refers to frequent and persistent detachment from bodily self and disengagement from the outside world. As a dissociative disorder, DPD affects 1-2% of the population, but takes 7-12 years on average to be accurately diagnosed. In this systematic review, we comprehensively describe research targeting the neural correlates of core DPD symptoms, covering publications between 1992 and 2020 that have used electrophysiological techniques. The aim was to investigate the diagnostic potential of these relatively inexpensive and convenient neuroimaging tools. We review the EEG power spectrum, components of the event-related potential (ERP), as well as vestibular and heartbeat evoked potentials as likely electrophysiological biomarkers to study DPD symptoms. We argue that acute anxiety- or trauma-related impairments in the integration of interoceptive and exteroceptive signals play a key role in the formation of DPD symptoms, and that future research needs analysis methods that can take this integration into account. We suggest tools for prospective studies of electrophysiological DPD biomarkers, which are urgently needed to fully develop their diagnostic potential.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.