Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2110.08387v3

In the realm of commonsense reasoning, the incorporation of external knowledge has long been a topic of debate. The question remains: can we enhance the capabilities of pretrained sequence models by integrating external knowledge while still maintaining their flexibility? To address this query, a novel approach known as generated knowledge prompting has been developed. This method involves generating knowledge from a language model and providing it as additional input during the question-answering process. Unlike traditional methods that rely on task-specific supervision or access to structured knowledge bases, generated knowledge prompting does not require such constraints. Remarkably, this technique has shown significant improvements in the performance of large-scale pretrained models across four commonsense reasoning tasks. Notably, it has achieved state-of-the-art results in numerical commonsense (NumerSense), general commonsense (CommonsenseQA 2.0), and scientific commonsense (QASC) benchmarks. It is worth noting that many existing commonsense reasoning datasets are derived from pre-existing knowledge bases such as ConceptNet and ATOMIC. While leveraging related knowledge from these sources often leads to performance gains, domain mismatches can pose challenges when dealing with datasets lacking suitable knowledge bases or queries that do not align with existing domains. Generated text augmentation during inference has emerged as a promising strategy for enhancing model performance on commonsense reasoning tasks. Various approaches like self-talk and contrastive explanations have shown success in augmenting questions with model-generated text to improve inference accuracy. However, these methods typically rely on task-specific templates or finetuned generators, limiting their adaptability to new tasks. In contrast, generated knowledge prompting stands out for its simplicity and flexibility. By eliciting human-written demonstrations in the style of the task, this method seamlessly integrates external knowledge without the need for extensive model finetuning. This approach not only sets new benchmarks in commonsense reasoning tasks but also underscores the potential of large-scale language models as valuable sources of high-quality external knowledge. Overall, generated knowledge prompting represents a significant advancement in leveraging language models for enhancing commonsense reasoning capabilities. Its success across multiple datasets highlights the versatility and effectiveness of this approach in improving inference accuracy and setting new standards in the field of natural language processing.

• - Incorporation of external knowledge in commonsense reasoning has been a topic of debate
• - Generated knowledge prompting is a novel approach that enhances pretrained sequence models by integrating external knowledge
• - This method involves generating knowledge from a language model and providing it as additional input during the question-answering process
• - It does not require task-specific supervision or access to structured knowledge bases, unlike traditional methods
• - Generated knowledge prompting has shown significant improvements in performance across four commonsense reasoning tasks
• - Achieved state-of-the-art results in NumerSense, CommonsenseQA 2.0, and QASC benchmarks
• - Existing commonsense reasoning datasets often rely on pre-existing knowledge bases like ConceptNet and ATOMIC
• - Domain mismatches can pose challenges when dealing with datasets lacking suitable knowledge bases or queries that do not align with existing domains
• - Generated text augmentation during inference has shown promise for enhancing model performance on commonsense reasoning tasks
• - Generated knowledge prompting stands out for its simplicity and flexibility compared to other augmentation approaches
• - Elicits human-written demonstrations in the style of the task to seamlessly integrate external knowledge without extensive model finetuning
• - Sets new benchmarks in commonsense reasoning tasks and highlights the potential of large-scale language models as sources of high-quality external knowledge

Summary- People are talking about using outside knowledge in thinking. - A new way called generated knowledge prompting helps models get smarter by adding extra information. - This method creates new information from a language model and uses it to answer questions better. - It works well on different tasks without needing special instructions or structured databases. - This approach has made big improvements in how well models can think. Definitions- Incorporation: Adding something into something else. - Commonsense reasoning: Using everyday knowledge to understand things. - Generated: Made or created. - Knowledge prompting: Helping models learn by giving them more information. - Language model: A computer program that understands and generates human language.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in incorporating external knowledge into natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This is particularly relevant in the realm of commonsense reasoning, where the ability to understand and reason about everyday situations is crucial for human-like intelligence. However, the question remains: can we enhance pretrained sequence models with external knowledge while maintaining their flexibility? In this blog article, we will explore a novel approach known as generated knowledge prompting that aims to answer this query. The concept of incorporating external knowledge into NLP tasks is not new. Traditional methods often rely on task-specific supervision or access to structured knowledge bases such as ConceptNet and ATOMIC. While leveraging related knowledge from these sources can lead to performance gains, it also poses challenges when dealing with datasets lacking suitable knowledge bases or queries that do not align with existing domains. To address these limitations, researchers have developed a new approach called generated knowledge prompting. This method involves generating knowledge from a language model and providing it as additional input during the question-answering process. Unlike traditional methods, generated knowledge prompting does not require task-specific supervision or access to structured databases. One of the key advantages of this approach is its simplicity and flexibility. By eliciting human-written demonstrations in the style of the task at hand, generated text augmentation seamlessly integrates external knowledge without extensive model finetuning. This makes it adaptable to new tasks and datasets without requiring any modifications. Remarkably, generated text augmentation has shown significant improvements in large-scale pretrained models across four commonsense reasoning tasks: NumerSense (numerical commonsense), CommonsenseQA 2.0 (general commonsense), QASC (scientific commonsense), and Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC). It has achieved state-of-the-art results in all four benchmarks, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing inference accuracy. Moreover, generated text augmentation also addresses domain mismatches that may arise when using pre-existing datasets derived from specific domains. By generating knowledge in the style of the task, this approach can bridge the gap between different domains and improve performance on datasets lacking suitable knowledge bases. It is worth noting that generated text augmentation during inference is not a new concept. Various approaches such as self-talk and contrastive explanations have shown success in augmenting questions with model-generated text to improve inference accuracy. However, these methods often rely on task-specific templates or finetuned generators, limiting their adaptability to new tasks. In contrast, generated knowledge prompting stands out for its simplicity and flexibility. It does not require any task-specific templates or finetuned generators, making it applicable to a wide range of tasks without any modifications. Overall, generated knowledge prompting represents a significant advancement in leveraging language models for enhancing commonsense reasoning capabilities. Its success across multiple datasets highlights the versatility and effectiveness of this approach in improving inference accuracy and setting new standards in the field of NLP. In conclusion, incorporating external knowledge into pretrained sequence models has long been a topic of debate in the realm of commonsense reasoning. Generated knowledge prompting offers a promising solution by seamlessly integrating external knowledge without requiring extensive model finetuning or access to structured databases. Its success across multiple benchmarks showcases its potential as a valuable tool for enhancing natural language understanding and reasoning abilities. As research continues to push the boundaries of NLP, we can expect generated knowledge prompting to play an increasingly important role in advancing our understanding of human-like intelligence.