Delphi: Towards Machine Ethics and Norms

AI-generated keywords: Machine Ethics Delphi Model Commonsense Norm Bank Moral Reasoning Deep Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the challenges of teaching machines to behave ethically
  • Four key challenges in machine ethics are identified:
  • Understanding moral precepts and social norms
  • Perceiving real-world situations visually or through natural language descriptions
  • Employing commonsense reasoning to anticipate outcomes in different contexts
  • Making ethical judgments considering competing values and their grounding in different contexts
  • The authors propose a deep learning paradigm called Delphi to address these challenges
  • A prototype model of Delphi demonstrates promising results in language-based commonsense moral reasoning, achieving up to 92.1% accuracy as vetted by humans
  • The Commonsense Norm Bank is introduced as a resource comprising 1.7 million examples of people's ethical judgments across various everyday situations
  • Important open research questions are raised, such as distinguishing between universal human values and personal values, modeling different moral frameworks, and developing explainable and consistent approaches to machine ethics
  • The study contributes significantly to advancing machine ethics within the deep learning paradigm
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Liwei Jiang, Jena D. Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Maxwell Forbes, Jon Borchardt, Jenny Liang, Oren Etzioni, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi

Abstract: What would it take to teach a machine to behave ethically? While broad ethical rules may seem straightforward to state ("thou shalt not kill"), applying such rules to real-world situations is far more complex. For example, while "helping a friend" is generally a good thing to do, "helping a friend spread fake news" is not. We identify four underlying challenges towards machine ethics and norms: (1) an understanding of moral precepts and social norms; (2) the ability to perceive real-world situations visually or by reading natural language descriptions; (3) commonsense reasoning to anticipate the outcome of alternative actions in different contexts; (4) most importantly, the ability to make ethical judgments given the interplay between competing values and their grounding in different contexts (e.g., the right to freedom of expression vs. preventing the spread of fake news). Our paper begins to address these questions within the deep learning paradigm. Our prototype model, Delphi, demonstrates strong promise of language-based commonsense moral reasoning, with up to 92.1% accuracy vetted by humans. This is in stark contrast to the zero-shot performance of GPT-3 of 52.3%, which suggests that massive scale alone does not endow pre-trained neural language models with human values. Thus, we present Commonsense Norm Bank, a moral textbook customized for machines, which compiles 1.7M examples of people's ethical judgments on a broad spectrum of everyday situations. In addition to the new resources and baseline performances for future research, our study provides new insights that lead to several important open research questions: differentiating between universal human values and personal values, modeling different moral frameworks, and explainable, consistent approaches to machine ethics.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Oct. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2110.07574v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Delphi: Towards Machine Ethics and Norms" explores the challenges of teaching machines to behave ethically. While ethical rules may seem straightforward, applying them to real-world situations is complex. The authors identify four key challenges in machine ethics: understanding moral precepts and social norms, perceiving real-world situations visually or through natural language descriptions, employing commonsense reasoning to anticipate outcomes in different contexts, and making ethical judgments considering competing values and their grounding in different contexts. To address these challenges, the authors propose a deep learning paradigm called Delphi. They present a prototype model that demonstrates promising results in language-based commonsense moral reasoning, achieving up to 92.1% accuracy as vetted by humans. This performance stands in stark contrast to the zero-shot performance of GPT-3 at 52.3%, indicating that massive scale alone does not imbue pre-trained neural language models with human values. To further support research in machine ethics, the authors introduce the Commonsense Norm Bank—a moral textbook customized for machines. It comprises 1.7 million examples of people's ethical judgments across various everyday situations. This resource provides new insights and establishes baseline performances for future studies while also raising important open research questions such as distinguishing between universal human values and personal values, modeling different moral frameworks, and developing explainable and consistent approaches to machine ethics. Overall, this study contributes significantly to advancing machine ethics by addressing the challenges of ethical decision-making within the deep learning paradigm. The proposed Delphi model shows promise in language-based commonsense moral reasoning while the Commonsense Norm Bank provides valuable resources for further exploration in this field.
Created on 22 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.