Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2110.02932v1

In the realm of machine learning (ML), practitioners from various backgrounds are increasingly utilizing ML methods. However, studies often focus on populations from Big Tech and academia, neglecting those in startups, non-tech companies, and the public sector. This selection bias excludes the broader, lesser-resourced ML community facing challenges in deploying ML with limited resources and increased existential risk. A qualitative analysis of 17 interviews with stakeholders from underrepresented organizations reveals tensions between privacy and ubiquity, resource management and performance optimization, and access and monopolization. The challenges of responsible ML development for resource-constrained organizations include company expectations, bias, explainability, data literacy, model lifecycles, and privacy concerns. Despite mixed opinions on the value of implementing ML technology among these organizations, there is a need for further study to address these challenges. The explainable AI community seeks meaningful mechanisms for understanding ML models while some practitioners advocate for transparency through example testing. However, desires for explanations vary among practitioners with concerns about uncertainty communication and overconfidence. Onboarding processes for ML products and tools remain underexplored but should focus on continual evolution based on user interactions with the model to ensure effective human-AI teaming. Overall,a more holistic understanding of limitations in responsible ML development is essential to guide future research agendas that benefit all stakeholders in the machine learning community.

• - Machine learning (ML) practitioners from various backgrounds increasingly use ML methods
• - Studies often focus on Big Tech and academia, neglecting startups, non-tech companies, and the public sector
• - Selection bias excludes broader, lesser-resourced ML community facing challenges in deploying ML with limited resources and increased existential risk
• - Tensions identified in qualitative analysis of 17 interviews: privacy vs. ubiquity, resource management vs. performance optimization, access vs. monopolization
• - Challenges for responsible ML development in resource-constrained organizations include company expectations, bias, explainability, data literacy, model lifecycles, and privacy concerns
• - Mixed opinions on value of implementing ML technology among underrepresented organizations highlight need for further study to address challenges
• - Explainable AI community seeks meaningful mechanisms for understanding ML models; some advocate transparency through example testing
• - Desires for explanations vary among practitioners with concerns about uncertainty communication and overconfidence
• - Onboarding processes for ML products/tools should focus on continual evolution based on user interactions with the model to ensure effective human-AI teaming
• - Holistic understanding of limitations in responsible ML development is essential to guide future research agendas benefiting all stakeholders in the machine learning community

Summary1. People who use special computer programs to learn new things come from different backgrounds. 2. Some studies only look at big technology companies and schools, ignoring small businesses and government groups. 3. Some people are left out of learning because they don't have enough resources or face big challenges. 4. When talking about these computer programs, people argue about privacy, using resources well, and fair access. 5. It's important for everyone to understand the limits of these programs so that they can be used responsibly. Definitions- Machine Learning (ML): Using computer programs to help machines learn new things on their own. - Practitioners: People who do a certain job or activity regularly. - Selection bias: Choosing some things over others in a way that is not fair or balanced. - Existential risk: A danger that could threaten the very existence of something. - Qualitative analysis: Studying information based on qualities like feelings or opinions rather than numbers. - Monopolization: Having complete control over something so others cannot compete fairly. - Explainable AI: Making sure artificial intelligence can explain how it makes decisions in a way people can understand. - Model lifecycles: The stages a model goes through from being created to being replaced with something better. - Underrepresented organizations: Groups that are not often included or talked about in discussions or studies. - Onboarding processes: Helping someone get used to using a new product or tool effectively.

In recent years, machine learning (ML) has become increasingly popular among practitioners from various backgrounds. However, most studies and research in this field have focused on populations from Big Tech companies and academia, leaving out those in startups, non-tech companies, and the public sector. This selection bias excludes a significant portion of the ML community that faces challenges in deploying ML with limited resources and increased existential risk. To address this issue, a recent research paper titled "Challenges of Responsible Machine Learning Development for Resource-Constrained Organizations" conducted a qualitative analysis of 17 interviews with stakeholders from underrepresented organizations. The study aimed to identify the unique challenges faced by these organizations in developing responsible ML practices. The findings of the study revealed several key tensions that resource-constrained organizations face when implementing ML technology. These include privacy versus ubiquity, resource management versus performance optimization, and access versus monopolization. Let's take a closer look at each of these challenges. Privacy is a major concern for many organizations when it comes to using ML technology. On one hand, they want to utilize the benefits of ubiquitous data collection through ML models; on the other hand, they must ensure that sensitive information is protected. This tension between privacy and ubiquity can be challenging for resource-constrained organizations as they may not have access to sophisticated data protection tools or expertise. Resource management is another critical challenge for these organizations as they often have limited resources compared to big tech companies or academic institutions. They must balance their resources between developing efficient models while also ensuring responsible practices such as addressing bias and explainability concerns. Access to advanced technologies can also be an issue for smaller or non-tech companies looking to implement ML solutions. With larger tech companies dominating the market and monopolizing access to cutting-edge tools and techniques, smaller organizations may struggle to keep up with advancements in this rapidly evolving field. The study also identified several specific challenges related to responsible development practices within resource-constrained organizations. These include managing company expectations, addressing bias in data and models, promoting data literacy among employees, understanding the lifecycle of ML models, and privacy concerns. One interesting finding from the study was the mixed opinions among practitioners regarding the value of implementing ML technology. While some saw it as a necessary step for their organization's growth and success, others expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on society and ethical implications. To address these challenges, there is a need for further research to guide responsible ML development practices within resource-constrained organizations. The explainable AI community is actively seeking meaningful mechanisms for understanding ML models while some practitioners advocate for transparency through example testing. However, there are varying desires for explanations among different stakeholders with concerns about uncertainty communication and overconfidence. The study also highlighted the importance of effective onboarding processes for ML products and tools. This area remains underexplored but should focus on continual evolution based on user interactions with the model to ensure effective human-AI teaming. In conclusion, this research paper sheds light on important challenges faced by resource-constrained organizations in developing responsible ML practices. It emphasizes the need for a more holistic understanding of limitations in responsible ML development to guide future research agendas that benefit all stakeholders in the machine learning community. By addressing these challenges, we can promote inclusive and ethical use of ML technology across various industries and sectors.