Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcare

AI-generated keywords: Artificial intelligence algorithm fairness healthcare disparities machine learning medical decision-making

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Algorithm fairness in AI systems in healthcare is a critical challenge to provide equitable care
  • Recent assessments have revealed significant disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and billing based on race sub-populations
  • Origins of algorithmic biases include image acquisition discrepancies, genetic variations, and labeling practices
  • Factors contribute to healthcare inequalities and hinder efforts towards fair and unbiased care
  • Novel approaches like decentralized learning methods and disentanglement techniques aim to mitigate bias in AI algorithms
  • Enhancing model explainability is crucial for promoting fairer outcomes in medical decision-making and patient care delivery
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Richard J. Chen, Tiffany Y. Chen, Jana Lipkova, Judy J. Wang, Drew F. K. Williamson, Ming Y. Lu, Sharifa Sahai, Faisal Mahmood

Abstract: In the current development and deployment of many artificial intelligence (AI) systems in healthcare, algorithm fairness is a challenging problem in delivering equitable care. Recent evaluation of AI models stratified across race sub-populations have revealed enormous inequalities in how patients are diagnosed, given treatments, and billed for healthcare costs. In this perspective article, we summarize the intersectional field of fairness in machine learning through the context of current issues in healthcare, outline how algorithmic biases (e.g. - image acquisition, genetic variation, intra-observer labeling variability) arise in current clinical workflows and their resulting healthcare disparities. Lastly, we also review emerging strategies for mitigating bias via decentralized learning, disentanglement, and model explainability.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Oct. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2110.00603v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in healthcare, ensuring algorithm fairness is a critical challenge to provide equitable care. Recent assessments of AI models segmented by race sub-populations have uncovered significant disparities in how patients are diagnosed, treated, and billed for medical services. This article delves into the intricate domain of fairness in machine learning within the context of contemporary healthcare issues. It elucidates on the origins of algorithmic biases within current clinical processes, such as image acquisition discrepancies, genetic variations, and inconsistencies in intra-observer labeling practices. Ultimately, these factors contribute to healthcare inequalities and hinder efforts towards providing fair and unbiased care to all patients. To address this issue, novel approaches have been explored such as decentralized learning methods and disentanglement techniques that aim to mitigate bias in AI algorithms. Additionally, enhancing model explainability has also been identified as a crucial aspect in promoting fairer outcomes in medical decision-making and patient care delivery. Through shedding light on these emerging strategies, this perspective offers insights into effectively addressing algorithmic biases to promote fairer outcomes in medicine and healthcare. The authors - Richard J. Chen, Tiffany Y. Chen, Jana Lipkova, Judy J. Wang, Drew F. K. Williamson, Ming Y. Lu, Sharifa Sahai, and Faisal Mahmood - present a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in achieving algorithm fairness within AI applications for medicine and healthcare.
Created on 25 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.