Matching Algorithms for Blood Donation

AI-generated keywords: Matching Algorithms Blood Donation Global Challenge Large-Scale Coordination Donor Behavior

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the global challenge of meeting the demand for donated blood, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Emphasize the need for large-scale coordination to bridge the gap between supply and demand.
  • Leveraged Facebook Blood Donation tool for algorithmic matching of blood donors with donation opportunities.
  • Use donor action as a proxy indicator for actual donations.
  • Developed automated policies based on an online matching model to optimize the matching process.
  • Study provides theoretical guarantees for policies, ensuring an increase in expected donations and equitable treatment of blood recipients.
  • Simple matching strategy can boost donation numbers by 5-10%.
  • Pilot experiment shows a promising 5% relative increase in donor action rates.
  • Extrapolated results suggest approximately one hundred thousand additional users taking steps towards donating blood globally.
  • Gain valuable insights into donor behavior and responses to incentives within a social network setting.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Duncan C McElfresh, Christian Kroer, Sergey Pupyrev, Eric Sodomka, Karthik Sankararaman, Zack Chauvin, Neil Dexter, John P Dickerson

An early version of this paper appeared at EC'20. (https://doi.org/10.1145/3391403.3399458)

Abstract: Global demand for donated blood far exceeds supply, and unmet need is greatest in low- and middle-income countries; experts suggest that large-scale coordination is necessary to alleviate demand. Using the Facebook Blood Donation tool, we conduct the first large-scale algorithmic matching of blood donors with donation opportunities. While measuring actual donation rates remains a challenge, we measure donor action (e.g., making a donation appointment) as a proxy for actual donation. We develop automated policies for matching donors with donation opportunities, based on an online matching model. We provide theoretical guarantees for these policies, both regarding the number of expected donations and the equitable treatment of blood recipients. In simulations, a simple matching strategy increases the number of donations by 5-10%; a pilot experiment with real donors shows a 5% relative increase in donor action rate (from 3.7% to 3.9%). When scaled to the global Blood Donation tool user base, this corresponds to an increase of around one hundred thousand users taking action toward donation. Further, observing donor action on a social network can shed light onto donor behavior and response to incentives. Our initial findings align with several observations made in the medical and social science literature regarding donor behavior.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Aug. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2108.04862v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper "Matching Algorithms for Blood Donation," authors Duncan C McElfresh, Christian Kroer, Sergey Pupyrev, Eric Sodomka, Karthik Sankararaman, Zack Chauvin, Neil Dexter, and John P Dickerson address the global challenge of meeting the demand for donated blood. They highlight that this demand is particularly acute in low- and middle-income countries and emphasize the need for large-scale coordination to bridge the gap between supply and demand. The researchers leverage the Facebook Blood Donation tool to conduct a groundbreaking algorithmic matching of blood donors with donation opportunities. While accurately measuring actual donation rates remains a complex task, they use donor action (such as scheduling a donation appointment) as a proxy indicator for actual donations. By developing automated policies based on an online matching model, they aim to optimize the matching process between donors and donation opportunities. Their study provides theoretical guarantees for these policies, ensuring both an increase in expected donations and equitable treatment of blood recipients. Through simulations, they demonstrate that a simple matching strategy can boost donation numbers by 5-10%. A pilot experiment involving real donors shows a promising 5% relative increase in donor action rates (from 3.7% to 3.9%). When extrapolated to the broader user base of the global Blood Donation tool, this translates to approximately one hundred thousand additional users taking steps towards donating blood. Moreover, by observing donor actions within a social network setting, the researchers gain valuable insights into donor behavior and responses to various incentives. Their initial findings align with existing observations from medical and social science literature on donor behavior. This innovative approach not only has the potential to significantly impact blood donation rates but also sheds light on effective strategies for encouraging altruistic behaviors within communities worldwide.
Created on 16 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.