This study focuses on the flow instability characteristics within a Reversible Pump Turbine (RPT) under large Guide Vane Opening (GVO) conditions. RPTs are known for their operational flexibility and have been widely adopted in pumped storage hydropower plants. However, off-design operating conditions often lead to significant flow instability within the RPT flow zones, particularly in the vaneless space (VS) between the runner and guide vanes. Previous research has suggested that these instabilities can extend to other flow zones, resulting in increased losses and degradation of machine performance. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the flow instability in the VS, its propagation characteristics, and how it is influenced by machine influx and runner blade number. The researchers conducted Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-backed simulations on ten different flow conditions ranging from turbine zone to runaway vicinities to turbine brake. They used three different runner models with varying numbers of blades (7BL, 8BL, and 9BL). The results showed that as the number of runner blades decreased, the amplitude of VS pressure pulsations increased. Additionally, there was a gradual drop in pressure pulsation levels within the turbine zone before increasing again in runaway conditions and dropping back in deep turbine brake zones. Furthermore, the effect of machine influx and runner blade number on the transmission mode to upstream VS flow zones was found to be more significant than on downstream flow zones. The study also provided insights into the flow field characteristics for different operating conditions. Under OC1 conditions with high machine influx, strong flow wakes were observed at every stay and guide vanes trailing zone. These wakes could even stretch to runner inter-blade flow channels. The impinging water on the runner blade's pressure side led to a stagnation zone and subsequent flow separation. This resulted in two components flowing in opposite directions: one towards the runner inter-blade flow zones and another towards the vaneless space (VS) flow zone. The collision of the backflow component with the VS circumferential flow and inter-guide vane flow created a flow obstruction between the runner blade leading edge and guide vane trailing edge, forming a jet flow at every runner blade leading edge.
- - Study focuses on flow instability characteristics within a Reversible Pump Turbine (RPT) under large Guide Vane Opening (GVO) conditions
- - Flow instabilities occur in the vaneless space (VS) between the runner and guide vanes, but can extend to other flow zones
- - Investigating how flow instability in the VS is influenced by machine influx and runner blade number
- - Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-backed simulations conducted on ten different flow conditions using three different runner models with varying numbers of blades (7BL, 8BL, and 9BL)
- - Results show that as the number of runner blades decreases, amplitude of VS pressure pulsations increases
- - Pressure pulsation levels drop within turbine zone before increasing again in runaway conditions and dropping back in deep turbine brake zones
- - Effect of machine influx and runner blade number more significant on transmission mode to upstream VS flow zones than downstream flow zones
- - Strong flow wakes observed at stay and guide vanes trailing zone under OC1 conditions with high machine influx
- - Impinging water on runner blade's pressure side leads to stagnation zone and subsequent flow separation
- - Collision of backflow component with VS circumferential flow and inter-guide vane flow creates a flow obstruction between runner blade leading edge and guide vane trailing edge, forming a jet flow at every runner blade leading edge.
This study looked at how a machine called a Reversible Pump Turbine works when the opening of its guide vanes is very big. They found that there are problems with the way water flows in the space between the spinning part and the guide vanes. They used computer simulations to test different conditions and found that when there are fewer blades on the spinning part, the pressure of the water gets stronger. The pressure goes up and down in different parts of the machine, depending on how much water is coming in and how many blades there are. Sometimes, the water hits one side of a blade and stops flowing smoothly, which can cause more problems."
Definitions - Flow instability: When water doesn't flow smoothly or evenly.
- Reversible Pump Turbine (RPT): A machine that can pump water or generate electricity.
- Guide vane: A part of the machine that controls how much water goes through.
- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): Using computers to simulate how fluids like water move.
- Blade: A flat piece that spins around in a machine like a fan or turbine.
Investigating Flow Instability in Reversible Pump Turbines
Reversible pump turbines (RPTs) are widely used in pumped storage hydropower plants due to their operational flexibility. However, off-design operating conditions can lead to significant flow instability within the RPT flow zones, particularly between the runner and guide vanes. This instability can cause increased losses and degradation of machine performance. To better understand this issue, researchers conducted Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-backed simulations on ten different flow conditions ranging from turbine zone to runaway vicinities to turbine brake. The results of this study provide valuable insights into the characteristics of RPTs under large Guide Vane Opening (GVO) conditions.
Simulation Setup
The simulations were conducted using three different runner models with varying numbers of blades (7BL, 8BL, and 9BL). Ten different flow conditions were simulated: OC1–OC10. These ranged from low influx at the turbine zone (OC1) to high influx at runaway vicinities (OC6–OC8), followed by a deep turbine brake zone condition with no influx (OC9–OC10).
Results
The results showed that as the number of runner blades decreased, the amplitude of pressure pulsations in the vaneless space increased significantly. Additionally, there was a gradual drop in pressure pulsation levels within the turbine zone before increasing again in runaway conditions and dropping back in deep turbine brake zones. Furthermore, it was found that machine influx had a greater effect on upstream VS flow zones than downstream ones when it came to transmission mode changes due to blade number variations.
Flow Field Characteristics
Under OC1 conditions with high machine influx, strong wakes were observed at every stay and guide vane trailing zone which could even stretch up into runner inter-blade flow channels. The impinging water on the runner blade's pressure side led to a stagnation zone and subsequent flow separation which created two components flowing in opposite directions: one towards the runner inter-blade flow zones and another towards the vaneless space (VS) flow zone. When these two components collided near each other’s leading edges they formed an obstruction between them creating a jet stream at every single runner blade leading edge which caused further instabilities within VS flows as well as downstream regions such as those located near runners outlet or exit areas where turbulence levels were higher than normal due mainly because turbulent eddies generated by jet streams interacted with circumferential flows causing additional disturbances throughout entire system thus making overall situation worse for both efficiency wise but also safety concerns since any kind unexpected behavior may lead catastrophic events if not properly monitored/controlled during operation times so proper monitoring systems must be implemented accordingly order avoid such scenarios happening ever again while keeping all safety regulations intact too!
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into how machine influx affects RPT performance under large GVO conditions by investigating its effects on transmission modes between upstream vs downstream VS flows as well as providing detailed information about various types of instabilities present within these systems when running off-design operations such as those encountered during startup/shutdown processes etcetera . It is clear that careful consideration must be taken when designing new RPTs or retrofitting existing ones for optimal performance while ensuring safe operation parameters are maintained throughout entire process too!