Epistemic Neural Networks

AI-generated keywords: Epistemic Neural Networks Uncertainty Modeling Deep Learning Probabilistic Inference Computational Efficiency

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors introduce Epistemic Neural Networks (ENN) as a novel interface for uncertainty modeling in deep learning
  • ENN framework encompasses all existing approaches to uncertainty modeling, equating each ENN to a Bayesian neural network
  • Shifts focus from developing probabilistic inference tools for neural networks to identifying best-suited neural networks for probabilistic inference
  • Propose KL-divergence as a metric for assessing progress in ENNs
  • Develop computational testbed for evaluating performance of various uncertainty modeling approaches in deep learning
  • Significant variations in performance observed among different approaches
  • High correlation between proposed metric and performance in sequential decision-making tasks demonstrated
  • New ENN architectures have potential to enhance statistical quality and computational efficiency
  • Study emphasizes importance of ENNs as tools for uncertainty modeling in deep learning, paving the way for advancements in leveraging neural networks for probabilistic inference tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ian Osband, Zheng Wen, Mohammad Asghari, Morteza Ibrahimi, Xiyuan Lu, Benjamin Van Roy

Abstract: We introduce the \textit{epistemic neural network} (ENN) as an interface for uncertainty modeling in deep learning. All existing approaches to uncertainty modeling can be expressed as ENNs, and any ENN can be identified with a Bayesian neural network. However, this new perspective provides several promising directions for future research. Where prior work has developed probabilistic inference tools for neural networks; we ask instead, `which neural networks are suitable as tools for probabilistic inference?'. We propose a clear and simple metric for progress in ENNs: the KL-divergence with respect to a target distribution. We develop a computational testbed based on inference in a neural network Gaussian process and release our code as a benchmark at \url{https://github.com/deepmind/enn}. We evaluate several canonical approaches to uncertainty modeling in deep learning, and find they vary greatly in their performance. We provide insight to the sensitivity of these results and show that our metric is highly correlated with performance in sequential decision problems. Finally, we provide indications that new ENN architectures can improve performance in both the statistical quality and computational cost.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.08924v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Authors Ian Osband, Zheng Wen, Mohammad Asghari, Morteza Ibrahimi, Xiyuan Lu, and Benjamin Van Roy introduce the concept of Epistemic Neural Networks (ENN) as a novel interface for uncertainty modeling in deep learning. They highlight that all existing approaches to uncertainty modeling can be framed within the ENN framework, with each ENN being equated to a Bayesian neural network. This fresh perspective opens up promising avenues for future research by shifting the focus from developing probabilistic inference tools for neural networks to identifying which neural networks are best suited as tools for probabilistic inference. The authors propose a straightforward and effective metric for assessing progress in ENNs: the KL-divergence with respect to a target distribution. To evaluate the performance of various canonical approaches to uncertainty modeling in deep learning, they develop a computational testbed centered on inference in a neural network Gaussian process. The code for this testbed is made publicly available as a benchmark on GitHub. Through their evaluation, the authors discover significant variations in performance among different uncertainty modeling approaches. They delve into the sensitivity of these results and demonstrate a high correlation between their proposed metric and performance in sequential decision-making tasks. Additionally, they provide insights suggesting that new ENN architectures have the potential to enhance both statistical quality and computational efficiency. In conclusion, this study by Osband et al. sheds light on the importance of Epistemic Neural Networks as tools for uncertainty modeling in deep learning. Their findings not only contribute valuable insights into current methodologies but also pave the way for further advancements in leveraging neural networks for probabilistic inference tasks.
Created on 11 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.