This article discusses the challenges of pattern discovery and validation in the context of managing Bill of Materials (BOMs) in software supply chains. It emphasizes the need for tools to improve BOM management due to the complexity of software supply chains. The article suggests using a machine-readable and standard format for BOMs, such as Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX), which enables the documentation and exchange of data and metadata for open source components. The evaluation of the proposed approach is conducted through member checking and case study research. Member checking involves obtaining feedback from domain experts who confirmed the accuracy and completeness of the identified patterns. In one exploratory study, the Delphi method was used, which involved multiple rounds of questioning and commenting by a panel of experts to define patterns with high confidence. The article acknowledges that member checking increases confidence but does not provide full validation due to potential biases. To address this, several full-fledged case studies were conducted using case study research methodology. These case studies involved observing the use of the handbook method within companies that were not experts in order to evaluate its effectiveness. While some areas for improvement were identified, overall, both member checking and case studies overwhelmingly confirmed the usefulness and validity of the handbook method for pattern discovery in BOM management. The article concludes by highlighting future work that includes subjecting the method to more rigorous testing, theory building, and evaluation. The authors aim to provide a rigorous method for pattern discovery in order to support practitioners in solving problems within their domains. Acknowledgments are given to individuals who contributed to improving this article through workshops and extensive suggestions from reviewers. In terms of further validation, it is suggested that independent researchers apply this method in different contexts to assess its effectiveness beyond what has been presented so far. The success observed in exploratory case studies indicates that the method worked as intended; however, more research is needed to confirm its transferability beyond these specific studies. Overall, this article provides insights into the challenges of pattern discovery and validation in BOM management and presents a specific approach -the handbook method- which has been evaluated through exploratory studies and case studies. The findings suggest that using scientific research methods can improve certainty and quality when proposing patterns within this domain.
- - Challenges of pattern discovery and validation in BOM management in software supply chains
- - Need for tools to improve BOM management due to complexity of software supply chains
- - Suggestion to use machine-readable and standard format for BOMs, such as SPDX
- - Evaluation of proposed approach through member checking and case study research
- - Member checking involves obtaining feedback from domain experts to confirm accuracy and completeness of identified patterns
- - Delphi method used in exploratory study involving multiple rounds of questioning and commenting by panel of experts to define patterns with high confidence
- - Member checking increases confidence but does not provide full validation due to potential biases
- - Full-fledged case studies conducted using case study research methodology to evaluate effectiveness of handbook method within companies that were not experts
- - Overall, member checking and case studies overwhelmingly confirmed usefulness and validity of handbook method for pattern discovery in BOM management
- - Future work includes subjecting the method to more rigorous testing, theory building, and evaluation
- - Acknowledgments given to individuals who contributed through workshops and extensive suggestions from reviewers
- - Suggestion for independent researchers to apply this method in different contexts for further validation beyond what has been presented so far
Summary:
1. It is difficult to find and check patterns in managing software supplies.
2. We need tools to help manage software supplies because they are complicated.
3. We should use a special format called SPDX for managing software supplies.
4. They checked their ideas with experts and real-life examples to make sure they were right.
5. They found that their method was helpful and valid, but more testing is needed.
Definitions- BOM management: Keeping track of the different parts needed for software.
- Software supply chains: The process of getting all the parts needed for software from different places.
- Machine-readable: Something that can be easily understood by computers.
- Standard format: A specific way of organizing information that everyone agrees on.
- SPDX: A type of standard format used for managing software supplies.
- Member checking: Asking experts if your ideas are correct and complete.
- Case study research: Studying real-life examples to learn more about something.
- Delphi method: A way of asking experts questions multiple times to get accurate answers.
- Biases: When someone has a preference or opinion that affects their judgment.
- Handbook method: A specific way of finding patterns in managing software supplies.
Pattern Discovery and Validation in Bill of Materials Management
Software supply chains are becoming increasingly complex, making it difficult to manage the many components involved. This complexity has led to a need for tools that can help with Bill of Materials (BOMs) management. To address this challenge, this article proposes a handbook method for pattern discovery and validation in BOM management. The evaluation of the proposed approach is conducted through member checking and case study research.
Proposed Approach: Handbook Method
The authors propose using a machine-readable and standard format for BOMs, such as Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX). SPDX enables the documentation and exchange of data and metadata for open source components. This allows practitioners to more easily identify patterns within their software supply chain which can then be used to improve BOM management processes.
Evaluation Methods
The proposed approach was evaluated through two methods: member checking and case study research. Member checking involves obtaining feedback from domain experts who confirmed the accuracy and completeness of the identified patterns. In one exploratory study, the Delphi method was used, which involved multiple rounds of questioning and commenting by a panel of experts to define patterns with high confidence. While member checking increases confidence in results, it does not provide full validation due to potential biases; therefore, several full-fledged case studies were conducted using case study research methodology involving observation within companies that were not experts in order to evaluate its effectiveness beyond what could be achieved through member checking alone.
Results & Conclusions
Overall, both member checking and case studies overwhelmingly confirmed the usefulness and validity of the handbook method for pattern discovery in BOM management. The success observed in exploratory case studies indicates that the method worked as intended; however, more research is needed to confirm its transferability beyond these specific studies - including subjecting it to more rigorous testing, theory building, and evaluation - as well as independent researchers applying this method in different contexts to assess its effectiveness beyond what has been presented so far. Acknowledgments are given to individuals who contributed significantly towards improving this article through workshops or extensive suggestions from reviewers during peer review process..
In conclusion, this article provides insights into challenges associated with pattern discovery & validation when managing BOMs within software supply chains along with presenting an effective solution -the handbook method- which has been evaluated through exploratory studies & case studies confirming its usefulness & validity when proposing patterns within this domain