Pattern Discovery and Validation Using Scientific Research Methods

AI-generated keywords: Pattern Discovery Validation BOM Management Software Supply Chains Handbook Method

AI-generated Key Points

  • Challenges of pattern discovery and validation in BOM management in software supply chains
  • Need for tools to improve BOM management due to complexity of software supply chains
  • Suggestion to use machine-readable and standard format for BOMs, such as SPDX
  • Evaluation of proposed approach through member checking and case study research
  • Member checking involves obtaining feedback from domain experts to confirm accuracy and completeness of identified patterns
  • Delphi method used in exploratory study involving multiple rounds of questioning and commenting by panel of experts to define patterns with high confidence
  • Member checking increases confidence but does not provide full validation due to potential biases
  • Full-fledged case studies conducted using case study research methodology to evaluate effectiveness of handbook method within companies that were not experts
  • Overall, member checking and case studies overwhelmingly confirmed usefulness and validity of handbook method for pattern discovery in BOM management
  • Future work includes subjecting the method to more rigorous testing, theory building, and evaluation
  • Acknowledgments given to individuals who contributed through workshops and extensive suggestions from reviewers
  • Suggestion for independent researchers to apply this method in different contexts for further validation beyond what has been presented so far
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dirk Riehle, Nikolay Harutyunyan, Ann Barcomb

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Pattern discovery, the process of discovering previously unrecognized patterns, is often performed as an ad-hoc process with little resulting certainty in the quality of the proposed patterns. Pattern validation, the process of validating the accuracy of proposed patterns, remains dominated by the simple heuristic of "the rule of three". This article shows how to use established scientific research methods for the purpose of pattern discovery and validation. We present a specific approach, called the handbook method, that uses the qualitative survey, action research, and case study research for pattern discovery and evaluation, and we discuss the underlying principle of using scientific methods in general. We evaluate the handbook method using three exploratory studies and demonstrate its usefulness.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2107.06065v1

This article discusses the challenges of pattern discovery and validation in the context of managing Bill of Materials (BOMs) in software supply chains. It emphasizes the need for tools to improve BOM management due to the complexity of software supply chains. The article suggests using a machine-readable and standard format for BOMs, such as Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX), which enables the documentation and exchange of data and metadata for open source components. The evaluation of the proposed approach is conducted through member checking and case study research. Member checking involves obtaining feedback from domain experts who confirmed the accuracy and completeness of the identified patterns. In one exploratory study, the Delphi method was used, which involved multiple rounds of questioning and commenting by a panel of experts to define patterns with high confidence. The article acknowledges that member checking increases confidence but does not provide full validation due to potential biases. To address this, several full-fledged case studies were conducted using case study research methodology. These case studies involved observing the use of the handbook method within companies that were not experts in order to evaluate its effectiveness. While some areas for improvement were identified, overall, both member checking and case studies overwhelmingly confirmed the usefulness and validity of the handbook method for pattern discovery in BOM management. The article concludes by highlighting future work that includes subjecting the method to more rigorous testing, theory building, and evaluation. The authors aim to provide a rigorous method for pattern discovery in order to support practitioners in solving problems within their domains. Acknowledgments are given to individuals who contributed to improving this article through workshops and extensive suggestions from reviewers. In terms of further validation, it is suggested that independent researchers apply this method in different contexts to assess its effectiveness beyond what has been presented so far. The success observed in exploratory case studies indicates that the method worked as intended; however, more research is needed to confirm its transferability beyond these specific studies. Overall, this article provides insights into the challenges of pattern discovery and validation in BOM management and presents a specific approach -the handbook method- which has been evaluated through exploratory studies and case studies. The findings suggest that using scientific research methods can improve certainty and quality when proposing patterns within this domain.
Created on 23 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.