When the Echo Chamber Shatters: Examining the Use of Community-Specific Language Post-Subreddit Ban

AI-generated keywords: Community-level bans Online Harassment Harmful Speech Word Frequency Divergence Dark Humor Communities

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study investigates effectiveness of community-level bans to combat online harassment and harmful speech
  • Proposes flexible unsupervised methodology to identify in-group language and track user activity on Reddit before and after ban
  • Utilizes word frequency divergence technique to identify uncommon words overrepresented in specific community
  • Uncommon words seen as linguistic signatures of the community, not proxies for harmful speech
  • Applied methodology to 15 banned subreddits, revealing heterogeneous responses from subreddits and individual users
  • Top users become less active overall following a ban, random users reduce use of in-group language without decreasing overall activity
  • Effectiveness of bans aligns with content of community; dark humor communities largely unaffected, white supremacy and fascism communities experience greatest impact
  • Bans do not affect all groups or users equally
  • Research contributes to understanding broader effects of bans across various online platforms
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Milo Z. Trujillo, Samuel F. Rosenblatt, Guillermo de Anda Jáuregui, Emily Moog, Briane Paul V. Samson, Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Allison M. Roth

15 pages (including references and appendix), 5 figures

Abstract: Community-level bans are a common tool against groups that enable online harassment and harmful speech. Unfortunately, the efficacy of community bans has only been partially studied and with mixed results. Here, we provide a flexible unsupervised methodology to identify in-group language and track user activity on Reddit both before and after the ban of a community (subreddit). We use a simple word frequency divergence to identify uncommon words overrepresented in a given community, not as a proxy for harmful speech but as a linguistic signature of the community. We apply our method to 15 banned subreddits, and find that community response is heterogeneous between subreddits and between users of a subreddit. Top users were more likely to become less active overall, while random users often reduced use of in-group language without decreasing activity. Finally, we find some evidence that the effectiveness of bans aligns with the content of a community. Users of dark humor communities were largely unaffected by bans while users of communities organized around white supremacy and fascism were the most affected. Altogether, our results show that bans do not affect all groups or users equally, and pave the way to understanding the effect of bans across communities.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Jun. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.16207v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this study titled "When the Echo Chamber Shatters: Examining the Use of Community-Specific Language Post-Subreddit Ban," Milo Z. Trujillo and colleagues investigate the effectiveness of community-level bans as a tool to combat online harassment and harmful speech. While previous research on this topic has yielded mixed results, the authors propose a flexible unsupervised methodology to identify in-group language and track user activity on Reddit before and after the ban of a community (subreddit). The researchers utilize a simple word frequency divergence technique to identify uncommon words that are overrepresented in a specific community. They emphasize that these uncommon words should not be seen as proxies for harmful speech but rather as linguistic signatures of the community itself. The methodology is applied to 15 banned subreddits, revealing heterogeneous responses from both subreddits and individual users. The findings indicate that top users tend to become less active overall following a ban, while random users often reduce their use of in-group language without decreasing their overall activity. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting that the effectiveness of bans aligns with the content of a community. Users belonging to dark humor communities appear largely unaffected by bans, whereas those associated with white supremacy and fascism experience the greatest impact. Overall, this research highlights that bans do not affect all groups or users equally. By shedding light on how bans influence different communities, it contributes to our understanding of their broader effects across various online platforms. The study's comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics surrounding community-level bans and their implications for combating online harassment and harmful speech.
Created on 15 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.