Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.11207v2

Most stars in the Universe are red dwarfs, which outnumber stars like our Sun by a factor of 5 and have a longer lifespan by a factor of 20. Recent observations have also revealed the presence of many temperate, rocky planets around these small stars. However, this poses a paradox - if red dwarfs are so abundant, why don't we see them in our sky? To address this "Red Sky paradox," researchers have formulated a Bayesian probability function to determine the likelihood of finding oneself around a Sun-like star. If the development of intelligent life from prebiotic chemistry is a rapid and universal process, then the advantage of red dwarfs in terms of longevity becomes less significant, softening the Red Sky paradox but exacerbating the classic Fermi paradox (which questions why we haven't detected any signs of extraterrestrial life). On the other hand, if humanity is indeed an outlier with only a 1-in-100 chance occurrence, it could be attributed to random chance (resolution I). The study outlines three other non-mutually exclusive resolutions (II-IV) that act as filters to reduce the suitability of red dwarfs for complex life. These resolutions may be supported or refuted by future observations. For example, if surveys reveal a scarcity of temperate rocky planets around small red dwarfs (the most numerous type), it would support resolution II. Similarly, if future characterization efforts find that red dwarf worlds have limited windows for complex life due to stellar evolution, it would support resolution III. Solving this paradox would not only provide insights into our own existence but also guide future experiments aimed at detecting remote life and understanding the limits of life in the cosmos. The study was conducted by David Kipping and published in PNAS.

• - Most stars in the Universe are red dwarfs
• - Red dwarfs outnumber stars like our Sun by a factor of 5
• - Red dwarfs have a longer lifespan by a factor of 20
• - Recent observations have revealed temperate, rocky planets around red dwarfs
• - The "Red Sky paradox" questions why we don't see red dwarfs in our sky despite their abundance
• - Researchers have formulated a Bayesian probability function to address the paradox
• - If intelligent life develops rapidly and universally, the advantage of red dwarfs becomes less significant, softening the paradox but exacerbating the Fermi paradox
• - Humanity could be an outlier with only a 1-in-100 chance occurrence (resolution I)
• - The study outlines three other resolutions (II-IV) that act as filters to reduce the suitability of red dwarfs for complex life
• - Future observations can support or refute these resolutions
• - Scarcity of temperate rocky planets around small red dwarfs would support resolution II
• - Limited windows for complex life due to stellar evolution on red dwarf worlds would support resolution III
• - Solving this paradox provides insights into our existence and guides future experiments in detecting remote life and understanding life's limits in the cosmos

Most stars in the Universe are red dwarfs, which are smaller and cooler than our Sun. Red dwarfs outnumber stars like our Sun by five times. They also have a longer lifespan, living 20 times longer than our Sun. Scientists have found rocky planets around red dwarfs that could have the right conditions for life. The "Red Sky paradox" asks why we don't see red dwarfs in our sky even though there are so many of them. Researchers have come up with a way to try and answer this question using math. If intelligent life exists everywhere, then the advantage of red dwarfs is not as important, but it makes another question called the Fermi paradox more difficult to answer. There is a small chance that humanity is unique and rare in the universe (resolution I). The study also suggests three other possible answers (II-IV) that make it harder for complex life to exist around red dwarfs. Future observations can help us figure out which answer is correct. If there aren't many rocky planets around small red dwarfs, it would support one of the answers (resolution II). And if complex life can only exist for a short time on these planets because of how their stars change over time, it would support another answer (resolution III). Solving this puzzle helps us understand why we exist and helps scientists plan future experiments to find life on other planets." Definitions- Stars: Big balls of hot gas that give off light. - Red dwarf: A type of

Exploring the Red Sky Paradox: Why Don't We See More Red Dwarfs in Our Sky?

Recent research conducted by David Kipping and published in PNAS has revealed a paradox that has puzzled astronomers for decades. Despite the fact that red dwarfs are the most numerous type of star in our universe, outnumbering stars like our Sun by a factor of 5 and having lifespans 20 times longer than those of stars like our Sun, we don’t see them in our sky. To address this “Red Sky paradox”, Kipping formulated a Bayesian probability function to determine the likelihood of finding oneself around a Sun-like star.

The Fermi Paradox

Kipping's research suggests two possible explanations for why we don't observe more red dwarfs in our sky. The first explanation is related to the classic Fermi paradox (which questions why we haven't detected any signs of extraterrestrial life). If development of intelligent life from prebiotic chemistry is rapid and universal process, then advantage of red dwarfs in terms of longevity becomes less significant, softening the Red Sky paradox but exacerbating the classic Fermi paradox. On other hand, if humanity is indeed an outlier with only 1-in-100 chance occurrence it could be attributed to random chance (resolution I).

Other Resolutions

The study outlines three other non-mutually exclusive resolutions (II-IV) that act as filters to reduce suitability of red dwarfs for complex life. These resolutions may be supported or refuted by future observations. For example, if surveys reveal scarcity temperate rocky planets around small red dwarfs (the most numerous type), it would support resolution II. Similarly if future characterization efforts find that red dwarf worlds have limited windows for complex life due to stellar evolution it would support resolution III.

Implications

Solving this paradox would not only provide insights into own existence but also guide future experiments aimed at detecting remote life and understanding limits of life in cosmos. Understanding how many planets orbiting small stars can sustain complex forms over long periods time will help us understand what makes Earth so special and whether there might be other places where intelligent civilizations exist or have existed before us.