Training Strategies for Deep Learning Gravitational-Wave Searches
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors explore potential of deep learning in detecting gravitational waves emitted by compact binary systems
- Deep learning algorithms can generalize low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) signals to high SNR ones but not vice versa
- Providing high SNR signals during training does not offer significant benefits; fastest convergence achieved with low SNR samples early on
- Networks sometimes struggle to recover signals when false alarm probability of less than $10^{-3}$ is required
- Introduction of unbounded Softmax replacement (USR) after training significantly improves performance, retaining over 97.5% sensitivity down to a false-alarm rate of 1 per month
Authors: Marlin B. Schäfer (Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik), Ondřej Zelenka (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena), Alexander H. Nitz (Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik), Frank Ohme (Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik), Bernd Brügmann (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena)
Abstract: Compact binary systems emit gravitational radiation which is potentially detectable by current Earth bound detectors. Extracting these signals from the instruments' background noise is a complex problem and the computational cost of most current searches depends on the complexity of the source model. Deep learning may be capable of finding signals where current algorithms hit computational limits. Here we restrict our analysis to signals from non-spinning binary black holes and systematically test different strategies by which training data is presented to the networks. To assess the impact of the training strategies, we re-analyze the first published networks and directly compare them to an equivalent matched-filter search. We find that the deep learning algorithms can generalize low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) signals to high SNR ones but not vice versa. As such, it is not beneficial to provide high SNR signals during training, and fastest convergence is achieved when low SNR samples are provided early on. During testing we found that the networks are sometimes unable to recover any signals when a false alarm probability $<10^{-3}$ is required. We resolve this restriction by applying a modification we call unbounded Softmax replacement (USR) after training. With this alteration we find that the machine learning search retains $\geq 97.5\%$ of the sensitivity of the matched-filter search down to a false-alarm rate of 1 per month.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.