Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2106.02228v1

The paper titled "Addressing Inquiries about History: An Efficient and Practical Framework for Evaluating Open-domain Chatbot Consistency" proposes a framework called AIH (Addressing Inquiries about History) to evaluate the consistency capacity of open-domain chatbots. The consistency capacity refers to the ability of a chatbot to avoid presenting contradictory responses about facts or opinions during a conversation. Traditional methods of evaluating chatbot consistency are costly, inefficient, and prone to subjective bias. To address these challenges, the AIH framework induces chatbots to redeclare historical facts or opinions in response to appropriate inquiries about the dialogue history. This is achieved through conversations between chatbots which are more efficient than human-bot interactions and help alleviate subjective bias. By rapidly obtaining a dialog session that contains responses with high contradiction possibilities, the framework enables efficient evaluation of chatbot consistency. In the contradiction recognition stage, either human judges or a natural language inference (NLI) model can be employed to determine whether the answers provided by the chatbots contradict historical information. Based on this recognition, chatbots can be ranked according to their contradiction statistics. Experiments conducted on open-domain chatbots demonstrate that this approach efficiently and reliably assesses the consistency capacity of chatbots with high ranking correlation with human evaluation indicating its effectiveness. The authors have released the AIH framework with hopes of improving the consistency capacity of chatbots. Overall, this paper presents an innovative and practical solution for evaluating open-domain chatbot consistency using an efficient conversation-based approach.

• - The paper proposes a framework called AIH (Addressing Inquiries about History) to evaluate the consistency capacity of open-domain chatbots.
• - Traditional methods of evaluating chatbot consistency are costly, inefficient, and prone to subjective bias.
• - The AIH framework induces chatbots to redeclare historical facts or opinions in response to appropriate inquiries about the dialogue history.
• - Conversations between chatbots are more efficient than human-bot interactions and help alleviate subjective bias.
• - The framework enables efficient evaluation of chatbot consistency by obtaining a dialog session with high contradiction possibilities.
• - Human judges or a natural language inference (NLI) model can be employed for contradiction recognition.
• - Chatbots can be ranked according to their contradiction statistics based on this recognition.
• - Experiments demonstrate that this approach efficiently and reliably assesses the consistency capacity of chatbots with high ranking correlation with human evaluation indicating its effectiveness.
• - The authors have released the AIH framework with hopes of improving the consistency capacity of chatbots.

The paper talks about a new way to check if chatbots are consistent in their answers. Traditional methods of checking consistency are expensive, slow, and can be influenced by personal opinions. The new framework makes chatbots repeat historical facts or opinions when asked about them. Chatbot conversations are better than talking to humans because they help reduce personal opinions. The framework helps evaluate consistency by looking at contradictions in the conversation. This approach has been tested and shown to work well in assessing chatbot consistency." Definitions - Framework: A plan or system that helps organize and solve a problem. - Evaluate: To carefully look at something and judge its quality or effectiveness. - Consistency: When something stays the same or follows a pattern. - Chatbot: A computer program that can have conversations with people. - Induce: To make something happen or cause someone to do something. - Inference: Figuring out information based on what you already know. - Contradiction: When two things cannot both be true at the same time. - Ranking: Putting things in order from best to worst based on certain criteria. - Correlation: How two things relate or connect to each other. - Released: Made available for others to use or access.

Evaluating Open-Domain Chatbot Consistency with AIH Framework

In recent years, chatbots have become increasingly popular as a means of providing customer service and interacting with users. However, one major challenge in the development of these systems is ensuring that they are able to provide consistent responses during conversations. This paper proposes an efficient and practical framework called AIH (Addressing Inquiries about History) for evaluating open-domain chatbot consistency.

Background on Evaluating Chatbot Consistency

Traditional methods used to evaluate the consistency capacity of chatbots involve costly human-chatbot interactions which can be inefficient and prone to subjective bias. To address this issue, the authors propose a novel approach based on conversation-based evaluation which rapidly obtains dialog sessions containing responses with high contradiction possibilities.

AIH Framework Overview

The AIH framework induces chatbots to redeclare historical facts or opinions in response to appropriate inquiries about the dialogue history. This is achieved by having two different bots engage in a conversation where each bot must respond appropriately given its knowledge base and understanding of the conversation so far. In order for this process to work effectively, both bots must be trained using natural language inference (NLI) models which allow them to recognize contradictions between their own statements and those made by other bots or humans during conversations.

Contradiction Recognition Stage

Once a dialog session has been obtained through conversation between two bots, either human judges or NLI models can be employed in order to determine whether any answers provided by the chatbots contradict historical information or not. Based on this recognition, chatbots can then be ranked according to their contradiction statistics allowing developers to quickly identify areas where improvements need to be made in order for their system’s consistency capacity increase over time.

Experimental Results & Conclusion

Experiments conducted on open-domain chatbots demonstrate that this approach efficiently and reliably assesses the consistency capacity of chatbots with high ranking correlation with human evaluation indicating its effectiveness. The authors have released their AIH framework online with hopes that it will help improve upon existing methods for evaluating open-domain chatbot consistency while also reducing costs associated with manual testing processes currently being used today. Overall, this paper presents an innovative and practical solution for evaluating open-domain chatbot consistency using an efficient conversation-based approach which could prove invaluable when developing future generations of conversational agents capable of engaging users more naturally than ever before!