Three Dimensional Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations with 160 Isotopic Species Evolved to Shock Breakout
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Sandoval et al. present cutting-edge three-dimensional simulations of core-collapse supernovae using the FLASH code
- The study focuses on two distinct progenitor scenarios: a 9.6-$M_{\odot}$ zero-metallicity star and a 10-$M_{\odot}$ solar-metallicity progenitor
- Monitoring of 160 nuclear species throughout simulations until shock breakout in 3D reveals the crucial role of relative velocity difference between supernova shock and metal-rich Rayleigh-Taylor "bullets"
- Maximum $^{56}\rm{Ni}$ velocities reaching approximately $1950~\rm{km~s}^{-1}$ and $1750~\rm{km~s}^{-1}$ observed at shock breakout from 2D and 3D 9.6-$M_{\odot}$ CHIMERA models respectively
- Transitioning from 2D to corresponding 3D models shows suppressed development of higher velocity structures when mesh alignments are maintained, leading to emergence of faster-growing spherical-bubble structures facilitating interactions between bullets and shocks
- Remarkable maximum $^{56}\rm{Ni}$ velocities around $2500~\rm{km~s}^{-1}$ achieved at shock breakout in investigation involving a 10-$M_{\odot}$ model
- Findings highlight intricate interplays between shock dynamics, metal-rich ejecta behavior, and morphological evolution influencing core-collapse supernova outcomes
Authors: Michael A. Sandoval, W. Raphael Hix, O. E. Bronson Messer, Eric J. Lentz, J. Austin Harris
Abstract: We present three-dimensional simulations of core-collapse supernovae using the FLASH code that follow the progression of the explosion to the stellar surface, starting from neutrino-radiation hydrodynamic simulations of the neutrino-driven phase performed with the CHIMERA code. We consider a 9.6-$M_{\odot}$ zero-metallicity progenitor starting from both 2D and 3D CHIMERA models, and a 10-$M_{\odot}$ solar-metallicity progenitor starting from a 2D CHIMERA model, all simulated until shock breakout in 3D while tracking 160 nuclear species. The relative velocity difference between the supernova shock and the metal-rich Rayleigh-Taylor (R-T) "bullets" determines how the metal-rich ejecta evolves as it propagates through the density profile of the progenitor and dictates the final morphology of the explosion. We find maximum $^{56}\rm{Ni}$ velocities of ${\sim} 1950~\rm{km~s}^{-1}$ and ${\sim} 1750~\rm{km~s}^{-1}$ at shock breakout from 2D and 3D 9.6-$M_{\odot}$ CHIMERA models, respectively, due to the bullets' ability to penetrate the He/H shell. When mapping from 2D, we find that the development of higher velocity structures is suppressed when the 2D CHIMERA model and 3D FLASH model meshes are aligned. The development of faster growing spherical-bubble structures, as opposed to the slower growing toroidal structure imposed by axisymmetry, allows for interaction of the bullets with the shock and seeds further R-T instabilities at the He/H interface. We see similar effects in the 10-$M_{\odot}$ model, which achieves maximum $^{56}\rm{Ni}$ velocities of ${\sim} 2500~\rm{km~s}^{-1}$ at shock breakout.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.