Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.09506v1

In their paper titled "Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review," authors Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Minglang Yin, and George Em Karniadakis discuss the challenges faced in simulating flow problems using numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE). Despite significant progress made over the last 50 years, several issues persist. One such challenge is the inability to incorporate noisy data into existing algorithms seamlessly. Additionally, mesh-generation remains a complex task and high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE are difficult to tackle. The authors highlight that solving inverse flow problems is often prohibitively expensive and requires complex formulations and new computer codes. To address these challenges, they propose a novel approach called flow physics-informed learning. This approach aims to integrate data and mathematical models seamlessly by leveraging physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). The effectiveness of PINNs is demonstrated through various inverse problems related to three-dimensional wake flows, supersonic flows, and biomedical flows. By combining the power of neural networks with physical principles embedded in the NSE, PINNs offer a promising solution for accurately predicting flow behavior and solving inverse problems. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the limitations of current flow simulation techniques and presents an innovative approach that shows promise in overcoming these challenges. The integration of data-driven machine learning methods with physics-based models has the potential to revolutionize fluid mechanics research and enable more efficient and accurate simulations in various applications.

• - Challenges in simulating flow problems using numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE)
• - Inability to incorporate noisy data seamlessly into existing algorithms
• - Complexity of mesh-generation and difficulty in tackling high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE
• - Prohibitively expensive and complex formulations required for solving inverse flow problems
• - Proposal of a novel approach called flow physics-informed learning, integrating data and mathematical models seamlessly using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)
• - Effectiveness of PINNs demonstrated through various inverse problems related to three-dimensional wake flows, supersonic flows, and biomedical flows
• - Promise of PINNs in accurately predicting flow behavior and solving inverse problems by combining neural networks with physical principles embedded in the NSE
• - Potential revolutionization of fluid mechanics research through integration of data-driven machine learning methods with physics-based models.

Summary- There are challenges in using math to understand how things flow. - It is hard to use noisy information in the math equations. - Making a map of the problem can be complicated, especially if it has many parts. - Solving problems where you have to work backwards is very expensive and difficult. - A new way called flow physics-informed learning combines data and math to solve these problems better. Definitions- Simulating: pretending or imitating something - Numerical discretization: breaking something down into smaller parts and using numbers to understand it - Navier-Stokes equations: a set of math equations used to describe how fluids move - Algorithms: step-by-step instructions for solving a problem - Mesh-generation: creating a map or model of something with many small parts - Parametrized: having different variables or factors that can change the outcome - Prohibitively expensive: too costly or expensive to do - Formulations: ways of expressing or solving a problem - Inverse flow problems: trying to figure out what caused something by looking at its effects - Proposal: suggesting an idea or plan

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Fluid Mechanics: A Review

Flow simulation is an important part of fluid mechanics research, yet it has been a difficult task due to the complexity of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE). Over the last 50 years, significant progress has been made in numerical discretization and mesh generation, but several issues remain. In their paper titled "Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review," authors Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Minglang Yin, and George Em Karniadakis discuss these challenges and propose a novel approach called flow physics-informed learning.

Challenges Faced in Flow Simulation

The authors highlight several issues that have hindered progress in flow simulation. One such challenge is incorporating noisy data into existing algorithms seamlessly. Additionally, mesh-generation remains a complex task and high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE are difficult to tackle. Solving inverse flow problems is often prohibitively expensive and requires complex formulations and new computer codes.

Introducing Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)

To address these challenges, the authors propose a novel approach called flow physics-informed learning which integrates data and mathematical models seamlessly by leveraging physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). PINNs combine the power of neural networks with physical principles embedded in the NSE to accurately predict flow behavior and solve inverse problems. The effectiveness of PINNs is demonstrated through various inverse problems related to three dimensional wake flows, supersonic flows, and biomedical flows.

Conclusion

Overall this review provides valuable insights into the limitations of current flow simulation techniques as well as an innovative approach that shows promise in overcoming them. The integration of data driven machine learning methods with physics based models has the potential to revolutionize fluid mechanics research and enable more efficient simulations in various applications.