In situ formation of hot Jupiters with companion super-Earths
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The study examines the plausibility of in situ formation of multiple-planet systems that include a hot Jupiter and smaller planetary companions.
- Examples of such systems, like WASP-47, Kepler-730, and TOI-1130, have been confirmed through observations.
- $N$-body simulations are used to incorporate realistic treatments of collisions, an evolving protoplanetary disc, and eccentricity/inclination damping of planetary embryos.
- Two different models are used for the core of the giant planet: a 'seed-model' and an 'equal-mass-model'.
- Simulations based on the seed-model reveal that systems containing a hot Jupiter and super-Earths can be formed through four distinct phases: early giant impacts; runaway gas accretion onto the seed protoplanet; disc damping-dominated evolution of the embryos orbiting exterior to the giant planet; and a late chaotic phase after dispersal of the gas disc.
- Approximately 1% of simulations using the equal-mass model result in the formation of a giant planet following the same four-phase evolution.
- Synthetic transit observations from these simulations indicate an occurrence rate of 0.26% for systems with both a hot Jupiter and an inner super Earth.
- Simulated hot Jupiters are rarely detected as single transiting planets, which disagrees with observations.
- Some simulations produce two close-in giants resembling WASP 148 system.
- Overall, this study demonstrates that this particular scenario provides a viable pathway for forming systems with unusual architectures but does not apply to most hot Jupiters.
Authors: Sanson T. S. Poon, Richard P. Nelson, Gavin A. L. Coleman
Abstract: Observations have confirmed the existence of multiple-planet systems containing a hot Jupiter and smaller planetary companions. Examples include WASP-47, Kepler-730, and TOI-1130. We examine the plausibility of forming such systems in situ using $N$-body simulations that include a realistic treatment of collisions, an evolving protoplanetary disc and eccentricity/inclination damping of planetary embryos. Initial conditions are constructed using two different models for the core of the giant planet: a 'seed-model' and an 'equal-mass-model'. The former has a more massive protoplanet placed among multiple small embryos in a compact configuration. The latter consists only of equal-mass embryos. Simulations of the seed-model lead to the formation of systems containing a hot Jupiter and super-Earths. The evolution consistently follows four distinct phases: early giant impacts; runaway gas accretion onto the seed protoplanet; disc damping-dominated evolution of the embryos orbiting exterior to the giant; a late chaotic phase after dispersal of the gas disc. Approximately 1% of the equal-mass simulations form a giant and follow the same four-phase evolution. Synthetic transit observations of the equal-mass simulations provide an occurrence rate of 0.26% for systems containing a hot Jupiter and an inner super-Earth, similar to the 0.2% occurrence rate from actual transit surveys, but simulated hot Jupiters are rarely detected as single transiting planets, in disagreement with observations. A subset of our simulations form two close-in giants, similar to the WASP-148 system. The scenario explored here provides a viable pathway for forming systems with unusual architectures, but does not apply to the majority of hot Jupiters.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.