An Ergonomic Interaction Workspace Analysis Method for the Optimal Design of a Surgical Master Manipulator

AI-generated keywords: Ergonomics Interaction Workspace Analysis Master Manipulator Teleoperated Robotic Surgery Optimization

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper discusses the importance of ergonomics in the design of a master control console for teleoperated robotic surgery.
  • The authors propose an Ergonomic Interaction Workspace Analysis method to optimize master manipulators by considering ergonomic factors during the design process.
  • The analysis focuses on identifying areas that need improvement in the physical space where surgeons operate the master manipulator.
  • Various ergonomic considerations such as comfort, ease of use, and efficiency are taken into account.
  • Optimization based on these factors can lead to increased comfort and efficiency for surgeons during surgical tasks.
  • Considering ergonomics during the design process enhances the quality of teleoperated robotic surgery.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dandan Zhang, Jindong Liu, Guangzhong Yang

Accepted by the Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics

Abstract: Master control console is a place where robots collaborate with humans in a shared environment. To this end, ergonomics is an important aspect to be considered. With ergonomic design, the surgeons can feel more comfortable to conduct the surgical tasks with higher efficiency, and the quality of the teleoperated robotic surgery can be improved. In this paper, an Ergonomic Interaction Workspace Analysis method is proposed to optimize master manipulators and fulfil ergonomics consideration for designing a master manipulator for teleoperated robotic surgery.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 May. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.07272v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "An Ergonomic Interaction Workspace Analysis Method for the Optimal Design of a Surgical Master Manipulator" discusses the importance of ergonomics in the design of a master control console for teleoperated robotic surgery. The master control console serves as a collaborative environment where robots and humans work together to improve the quality of teleoperated robotic surgery. To address this, the authors propose an Ergonomic Interaction Workspace Analysis method which aims to optimize master manipulators by considering ergonomic factors during the design process. By analyzing the interaction workspace, which refers to the physical space where surgeons operate the master manipulator, they can identify areas that need improvement to enhance ergonomics. This method takes into account various ergonomic considerations such as comfort, ease of use and efficiency. Through optimization based on these factors, surgeons can experience increased comfort while performing surgical tasks leading to higher efficiency and improved outcomes in teleoperated robotic surgery. Overall, this paper highlights the significance of ergonomics in designing a master manipulator for teleoperated robotic surgery and provides a framework for optimizing it to fulfill ergonomic requirements. By considering ergonomics during the design process, surgeons can have a more comfortable and efficient experience while conducting surgical tasks ultimately enhancing the quality of teleoperated robotic surgery.
Created on 11 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.