Learning Early Exit Strategies for Additive Ranking Ensembles

AI-generated keywords: Search engine ranking pipelines

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large machine-learned ensembles of regression trees commonly used in search engine ranking pipelines
  • LEAR technique proposed to enhance efficiency and reduce query response time by leveraging a classifier to predict early exit from ensemble
  • Augmented representation for documents used in training classifier includes additional information like rank, accumulated score, normalized value, and number of candidates for the query
  • Comparison between LEAR and EPT on MSN-1 dataset showed up to 3x speedup with no degradation in effectiveness when placing sentinel after 50th tree
  • Adjusting confidence threshold allows for different levels of aggressiveness with varying speedups and ranking quality degradation
  • LEAR demonstrated significant improvements in query processing efficiency without compromising ranking quality on public datasets
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Francesco Busolin, Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Salvatore Trani

44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, 2217-2221
5 pages, 3 figures, ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 21)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Modern search engine ranking pipelines are commonly based on large machine-learned ensembles of regression trees. We propose LEAR, a novel - learned - technique aimed to reduce the average number of trees traversed by documents to accumulate the scores, thus reducing the overall query response time. LEAR exploits a classifier that predicts whether a document can early exit the ensemble because it is unlikely to be ranked among the final top-k results. The early exit decision occurs at a sentinel point, i.e., after having evaluated a limited number of trees, and the partial scores are exploited to filter out non-promising documents. We evaluate LEAR by deploying it in a production-like setting, adopting a state-of-the-art algorithm for ensembles traversal. We provide a comprehensive experimental evaluation on two public datasets. The experiments show that LEAR has a significant impact on the efficiency of the query processing without hindering its ranking quality. In detail, on a first dataset, LEAR is able to achieve a speedup of 3x without any loss in NDCG1@0, while on a second dataset the speedup is larger than 5x with a negligible NDCG@10 loss (< 0.05%).

Submitted to arXiv on 06 May. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.02568v1

, , , , In the realm of modern search engine ranking pipelines, large machine-learned ensembles of regression trees are commonly utilized. However, to enhance efficiency and reduce query response time, a novel technique called LEAR has been proposed. LEAR leverages a classifier that predicts whether a document can exit the ensemble early, thus reducing the number of trees traversed. This decision is made at a sentinel point after evaluating a limited number of trees, using partial scores to filter out non-promising documents. To train the classifier with examples of both continuing and exiting documents, an augmented representation for documents is employed. This representation includes additional information available at the sentinel point such as the document's rank, accumulated score, normalized value, and number of candidates for the query. Handling imbalance in the training set where continue documents are a minority is addressed by exploiting quality metrics like NDCG@k. between LEAR and EPT (existing method) were compared on the MSN-1 dataset. The results showed that placing the sentinel after the 50th tree yielded no degradation in effectiveness with up to 3x speedup for small confidence thresholds. By adjusting the confidence threshold, different levels of aggressiveness can be achieved with varying speedups and ranking quality degradation. Further comparisons were made with existing methods in related research areas such as pruning ensembles during or after training phases, budget-aware learning-to-rank algorithms, and early termination heuristics for reducing scoring process costs. Overall, LEAR demonstrated significant improvements in query processing efficiency without compromising ranking quality on public datasets. In conclusion, LEAR presents a promising approach to optimizing search engine ranking pipelines by efficiently filtering out non-relevant documents early in the scoring process while maintaining high-quality rankings for top-k results. Through comprehensive experimental evaluations and comparisons with existing methods, LEAR showcases its potential to significantly enhance query response times in production-like settings.
Created on 06 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.