Classifications of the Summative Assessment for Revised Blooms Taxonomy by using Deep Learning

Authors: Manjushree D. Laddha, Varsha T. Lokare, Arvind W. Kiwelekar, Laxman D. Netak

International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 69.3(2021):211-218
8 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Education is the basic step of understanding the truth and the preparation of the intelligence to reflect. Focused on the rational capacity of the human being the Cognitive process and knowledge dimensions of Revised Blooms Taxonomy helps to differentiate the procedure of studying into six types of various cognitive processes and four types of knowledge dimensions. These types are synchronized in the increasing level of difficulty. In this paper Software Engineering courses of B.Tech Computer Engineering and Information Technology offered by various Universities and Educational Institutes have been investigated for Revised Blooms Taxonomy RBT. Questions are a very useful constituent. Knowledge intelligence and strength of the learners can be tested by applying questions.The fundamental goal of this paper is to create a relative study of the classification of the summative assessment based on Revised Blooms Taxonomy using the Convolutional Neural Networks CNN Long Short-Term Memory LSTM of Deep Learning techniques in an endeavor to attain significant accomplishment and elevated precision levels.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Apr. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.08819v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 25 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.