Does BERT Pretrained on Clinical Notes Reveal Sensitive Data?

AI-generated keywords: Privacy PHI BERT EHR Security

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study investigates risks of releasing weights of a BERT model trained on sensitive, non-deidentified Electronic Health Records (EHR)
  • Large Transformers pretrained on clinical notes show improvements in predictive clinical tasks
  • Concerns arise regarding privacy and security of patient information
  • Cost and data access requirements make parameter sharing attractive, but safety of releasing weights needs assessment
  • Various approaches designed to recover Personal Health Information (PHI) from trained BERT
  • Focus on extracting patient names and associated medical conditions
  • Simple probing methods not effective, but more sophisticated attacks may succeed in extracting sensitive information
  • Privacy implications should be considered when releasing pretrained models trained on sensitive healthcare data
  • Experimental setup and baseline probing models provided publicly for further research at https://github.com/elehman16/exposing_patient_data_release
  • Study highlights potential risks and emphasizes need for privacy considerations and robust security measures to protect patient data.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Eric Lehman, Sarthak Jain, Karl Pichotta, Yoav Goldberg, Byron C. Wallace

NAACL Camera Ready Submission

Abstract: Large Transformers pretrained over clinical notes from Electronic Health Records (EHR) have afforded substantial gains in performance on predictive clinical tasks. The cost of training such models (and the necessity of data access to do so) coupled with their utility motivates parameter sharing, i.e., the release of pretrained models such as ClinicalBERT. While most efforts have used deidentified EHR, many researchers have access to large sets of sensitive, non-deidentified EHR with which they might train a BERT model (or similar). Would it be safe to release the weights of such a model if they did? In this work, we design a battery of approaches intended to recover Personal Health Information (PHI) from a trained BERT. Specifically, we attempt to recover patient names and conditions with which they are associated. We find that simple probing methods are not able to meaningfully extract sensitive information from BERT trained over the MIMIC-III corpus of EHR. However, more sophisticated "attacks" may succeed in doing so: To facilitate such research, we make our experimental setup and baseline probing models available at https://github.com/elehman16/exposing_patient_data_release

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Apr. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.07762v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study titled "Does BERT Pretrained on Clinical Notes Reveal Sensitive Data? ", authors Eric Lehman, Sarthak Jain, Karl Pichotta, Yoav Goldberg, and Byron C. Wallace investigate the potential risks associated with releasing the weights of a BERT model trained on sensitive, non-deidentified Electronic Health Records (EHR). While large Transformers pretrained over clinical notes from EHR have shown significant improvements in predictive clinical tasks, concerns arise regarding the privacy and security of patient information. The authors highlight that the cost and data access requirements for training such models make parameter sharing an attractive option. However, if researchers have access to large sets of sensitive EHR data and train a BERT model or similar models on it, there is a need to assess whether it would be safe to release the weights of such a model. To address this concern, the authors design various approaches aimed at recovering Personal Health Information (PHI) from a trained BERT. Specifically, they focus on extracting patient names and their associated medical conditions. The study utilizes the MIMIC-III corpus of EHR for training BERT models. The findings indicate that simple probing methods are not effective in extracting sensitive information from BERT trained on the MIMIC-III corpus. However, more sophisticated "attacks" may potentially succeed in doing so. These results emphasize the importance of considering privacy implications when releasing pretrained models trained on sensitive healthcare data. To facilitate further research in this area, the authors provide their experimental setup and baseline probing models publicly available at https://github.com/elehman16/exposing_patient_data_release . This resource can aid researchers in exploring potential vulnerabilities and developing safeguards to protect patient privacy when working with pretrained clinical language models. Overall, this study sheds light on the potential risks associated with releasing weights of pretrained models trained on non-deidentified EHR data. It underscores the need for careful consideration of privacy concerns and the development of robust security measures to ensure patient data remains protected.
Created on 06 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.