Skilled and Mobile: Survey Evidence of AI Researchers' Immigration Preferences

AI-generated keywords: AI researchers immigration preferences motivations destination countries talent migration patterns

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers conducted a survey of 524 AI researchers who had papers accepted at prestigious AI conferences, NeurIPS and ICML.
  • The study aimed to understand immigration preferences and motivations of AI researchers, filling a crucial gap in the literature.
  • Top destinations for AI researchers included the U.S., U.K., Canada, Switzerland, and France.
  • Factors influencing immigration decisions included professional opportunities, lifestyle and culture, political climate, personal relations, and immigration policies.
  • Visa and immigration difficulties were perceived as impediments to conducting AI research in certain countries.
  • The study sheds light on the importance of understanding talent migration patterns for future policy-making in artificial intelligence.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Remco Zwetsloot, Baobao Zhang, Noemi Dreksler, Lauren Kahn, Markus Anderljung, Allan Dafoe, Michael C. Horowitz

Accepted for poster presentation at the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Countries, companies, and universities are increasingly competing over top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) researchers. Where are these researchers likely to immigrate and what affects their immigration decisions? We conducted a survey $(n = 524)$ of the immigration preferences and motivations of researchers that had papers accepted at one of two prestigious AI conferences: the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) and the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). We find that the U.S. is the most popular destination for AI researchers, followed by the U.K., Canada, Switzerland, and France. A country's professional opportunities stood out as the most common factor that influences immigration decisions of AI researchers, followed by lifestyle and culture, the political climate, and personal relations. The destination country's immigration policies were important to just under half of the researchers surveyed, while around a quarter noted current immigration difficulties to be a deciding factor. Visa and immigration difficulties were perceived to be a particular impediment to conducting AI research in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada. Implications of the findings for the future of AI talent policies and governance are discussed.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Apr. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.07237v2

Researchers conducted a survey of 524 AI researchers who had papers accepted at prestigious AI conferences, NeurIPS and ICML. The study aimed to understand their immigration preferences and motivations, filling a crucial gap in the literature. The U.S., U.K., Canada, Switzerland, and France were the top destinations for AI researchers. Factors influencing immigration decisions included professional opportunities, lifestyle and culture, political climate, personal relations, and immigration policies. Visa and immigration difficulties were perceived as impediments to conducting AI research in certain countries. This study sheds light on the importance of understanding talent migration patterns for future policy-making in artificial intelligence. Supported by the Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence Fund and a U.S. government grant, the authors express gratitude to individuals for their feedback on the survey process. The methods section outlines how respondents were selected based on participation in top AI conferences and expert surveys. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into factors influencing AI researchers' immigration decisions and emphasizes policymakers' need to consider them when shaping future talent policies in artificial intelligence.
Created on 30 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.