Does The Monge Theorem Apply To Some Non-Euclidean Geometries ?

AI-generated keywords: Monge's theorem nonoverlapping circles Euclidean metric alternative metrics taxicab geometry

AI-generated Key Points

  • Monge's theorem states that for three nonoverlapping circles with distinct radii, the intersection points of each pair of external tangent lines are collinear.
  • The theorem is an application of Desargues' theorem.
  • The authors aim to investigate if Monge's theorem holds true in non-Euclidean geometries equipped with alternative metrics such as alpha and Lp.
  • Euclidean distance is commonly used but may not be practical in certain scenarios.
  • Alternative distance functions like the taxicab metric have been introduced to address this limitation.
  • The authors seek to extend Monge's theorem beyond its original application in Euclidean geometry and explore its validity in different geometries equipped with alternative metrics.
  • This study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of geometric principles and their applicability in various contexts.
  • The findings could have implications for diverse fields relying on geometric principles and measurements beyond traditional Euclidean settings.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Temel Ermiş, Özcan Gelişgen

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In geometry, Monge's theorem states that for any three nonoverlapping circles of distinct radii in the two dimensional analytical plane equipped with the Euclidean metric, none of which is completely inside one of the others, the intersection points of each of the three pairs of external tangent lines are collinear. So, it is clearly observed that Monge's theorem is an application of Desargues' theorem. Our main motivation in this study is to show whether Monge theorem is still valid even if the plane is equipped with the metrics alpha and Lp.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Apr. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.04274v1

In geometry, Monge's theorem states that for any three nonoverlapping circles of distinct radii in the two-dimensional analytical plane equipped with the Euclidean metric, none of which is completely inside one of the others, the intersection points of each of the three pairs of external tangent lines are collinear. This theorem is considered an application of Desargues' theorem. The main motivation behind this study by Temel Ermiş and Özcan Gelişgen is to investigate whether Monge's theorem still holds true when the plane is equipped with alternative metrics such as alpha and Lp. The authors aim to explore if this geometric principle remains valid in non-Euclidean geometries. The Euclidean distance, which measures the length between two points as a straight line segment, is commonly used. However, it may not be practical in certain scenarios where obstacles need to be avoided or when considering real-world movements on a spherical Earth. To address this limitation, alternative distance functions like the taxicab metric (dT) have been introduced. The taxicab geometry considers paths composed of line segments parallel to coordinate axes, mimicking movements along horizontal and vertical streets. The authors seek to extend Monge's theorem beyond its original application in Euclidean geometry and investigate its validity in different geometries equipped with alternative metrics such as alpha and Lp. By exploring these non-Euclidean geometries, they aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of geometric principles and their applicability in various contexts. Overall, this study aims to expand our knowledge about Monge's theorem by examining its validity in non-Euclidean geometries equipped with different metrics. The findings from this research could potentially have implications for diverse fields that rely on geometric principles and measurements beyond traditional Euclidean settings.
Created on 17 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.