"Weak AI" is Likely to Never Become "Strong AI", So What is its Greatest Value for us?

AI-generated keywords: Weak AI Strong AI Artificial Intelligence Artificial General Intelligence Bin Liu

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • AI has demonstrated superior performance in tasks such as image classification, game playing, and protein structure prediction
  • There are controversies surrounding AI, with limited overall progress observed over the past few decades
  • Two paradigms of AI research: weak AI (specialized systems for specific tasks) and strong AI (machines emulating human-level intelligence)
  • Guidelines and criteria provided by Liu to classify research works into weak or strong AI approaches
  • Value of weak AI explored, despite its limitations it has shown remarkable capabilities in various fields
  • Paper contributes to understanding the current state and future directions of AI research
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bin Liu

7 pages
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: AI has surpassed humans across a variety of tasks such as image classification, playing games (e.g., go, "Starcraft" and poker), and protein structure prediction. However, at the same time, AI is also bearing serious controversies. Many researchers argue that little substantial progress has been made for AI in recent decades. In this paper, the author (1) explains why controversies about AI exist; (2) discriminates two paradigms of AI research, termed "weak AI" and "strong AI" (a.k.a. artificial general intelligence); (3) clarifies how to judge which paradigm a research work should be classified into; (4) discusses what is the greatest value of "weak AI" if it has no chance to develop into "strong AI".

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Mar. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2103.15294v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Weak AI" is Likely to Never Become "Strong AI", So What is its Greatest Value for us?, author Bin Liu explores the advancements and controversies surrounding artificial intelligence (AI). While AI has demonstrated superior performance in various tasks such as image classification, game playing (including complex games like go, "Starcraft," and poker), and protein structure prediction, it has also been a subject of intense debate among researchers. The author begins by addressing the existence of controversies surrounding AI. Many researchers argue that despite significant achievements in specific domains, there has been limited substantial progress in AI overall over the past few decades. This observation sets the stage for further exploration into the different paradigms of AI research. Liu introduces two distinct paradigms: "weak AI" and "strong AI," also known as artificial general intelligence (AGI). Weak AI refers to specialized systems designed to perform specific tasks with high proficiency but lacks human-like cognitive abilities. On the other hand, strong AI aims to develop machines capable of emulating human-level intelligence across a wide range of tasks. The paper delves into how researchers can discern which paradigm a particular research work falls into. By providing guidelines and criteria for classification, Liu offers clarity on distinguishing between weak and strong AI approaches. This distinction becomes crucial when evaluating the potential impact and limitations of different research endeavors. Furthermore, the author explores the value of weak AI if it ultimately fails to evolve into strong AI. Despite its limitations, weak AI has already demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various fields. Understanding its greatest value becomes essential for leveraging its potential effectively. Overall, this paper provides an insightful analysis of the controversies surrounding AI while shedding light on the distinctions between weak and strong AI paradigms. By clarifying how to categorize research works within these paradigms and discussing the significance of weak AI even without achieving strong AI capabilities, Bin Liu contributes to a deeper understanding of the current state and future directions of AI research.
Created on 02 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.