Verification of an agent-based disease model of human mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
Authors: Cristina Curreli (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna), Francesco Pappalardo (Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania), Giulia Russo (Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania), Marzio Pennisi (Computer Science Institute, DiSIT, University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria, Italy), Dimitrios Kiagias (School of Mathematics & Statistics and Insigneo and Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield), Miguel Juarez (School of Mathematics & Statistics and Insigneo and Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield), Marco Viceconti (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna), .
Abstract: Agent-Based Models are a powerful class of computational models widely used to simulate complex phenomena in many different application areas. However, one of the most critical aspects, poorly investigated in the literature, regards an important step of the model credibility assessment: solution verification. This study overcomes this limitation by proposing a general verification framework for Agent-Based Models that aims at evaluating the numerical errors associated with the model. A step-by-step procedure, which consists of two main verification studies (deterministic and stochastic model verification), is described in detail and applied to a specific mission critical scenario: the quantification of the numerical approximation error for UISS-TB, an ABM of the human immune system developed to predict the progression of pulmonary tuberculosis. Results provide indications on the possibility to use the proposed model verification workflow to systematically identify and quantify numerical approximation errors associated with UISS-TB and, in general, with any other ABMs.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.