Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2102.08486v1

In their paper titled "Automatic Detection of Five API Documentation Smells: Practitioners' Perspectives," authors Junaed Younus Khan, Md. Tawkat Islam Khondaker, Gias Uddin, and Anindya Iqbal delve into the crucial role that official documentation plays in the learning and utilization of an API. They highlight how API documentation, akin to source code, is a software product in itself and emphasize the detrimental impact that poorly designed documentation can have on the ease of reusing API features. Drawing parallels to code smells or antipatterns, the authors identify 'smells' in API documentation as indicators of bad documentation styles that hinder proper understanding and usability. The research conducted by Khan et al. focuses on addressing these documentation smells through the development of a catalog comprising five distinct types. To validate their findings, they meticulously examined 1,000 API documentation units within Java's official API reference and instruction documents. Additionally, a survey involving 21 professional software developers confirmed that these identified smells are prevalent in existing API documentation and significantly impede productivity. One notable aspect of this study is the absence of prior research on automatically detecting API documentation smells. To bridge this gap, the authors employ a combination of rule-based techniques and deep learning classifiers to create tools capable of identifying and rectifying these issues automatically. Their best-performing classifier, BERT - a deep learning model - achieves impressive F1-scores ranging from 0.75 to 0.97. Presented at the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), this paper sheds light on an often overlooked aspect of software development - the quality of API documentation. By providing insights into common pitfalls and offering solutions for improvement through automated detection methods, Khan et al. 's work aims to enhance developer experiences and streamline the utilization of APIs for more efficient software development practices.

• - API documentation plays a crucial role in learning and utilizing an API, similar to source code
• - Poorly designed documentation can hinder the ease of reusing API features
• - 'Smells' in API documentation are indicators of bad documentation styles that impede understanding and usability
• - The research by Khan et al. identifies five distinct types of API documentation smells
• - A survey with 21 professional software developers confirmed the prevalence of these smells in existing API documentation and their negative impact on productivity
• - The authors developed tools using rule-based techniques and deep learning classifiers to automatically detect and rectify these issues
• - Their best-performing classifier, BERT, achieved impressive F1-scores ranging from 0.75 to 0.97
• - This study addresses the lack of prior research on automatically detecting API documentation smells and aims to enhance developer experiences for more efficient software development practices

SummaryAPI documentation is like a guide that helps us understand and use APIs. Bad documentation can make it hard to use API features. 'Smells' in documentation show when something is not explained well. Researchers found five types of these 'smells'. They made tools, like BERT, to find and fix these issues automatically. Definitions- API: A set of rules and tools for building software applications. - Documentation: Information or instructions that explain how something works. - Smells: Signs or hints that something may be wrong or poorly done. - Classifier: A tool that sorts things into different categories based on certain criteria. - F1-score: A measure of how accurate a classifier is at identifying things correctly.

Introduction

APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) are crucial components of modern software development, allowing developers to access pre-built functions and features without having to write them from scratch. However, the effectiveness of an API heavily relies on its documentation - a set of instructions and reference materials that guide developers in understanding and utilizing its capabilities. In their paper titled "Automatic Detection of Five API Documentation Smells: Practitioners' Perspectives," Junaed Younus Khan et al. delve into the importance of high-quality API documentation and how poorly designed documentation can hinder productivity.

The Role of API Documentation

Similar to source code, API documentation is a software product in itself. It serves as a communication tool between the creators of the API and its users - providing essential information such as usage guidelines, parameter descriptions, error handling procedures, etc. Good documentation not only helps developers understand how to use an API but also saves time by reducing trial-and-error attempts.

The Impact of Poorly Designed Documentation

Khan et al.'s research highlights the detrimental impact that bad documentation can have on the ease of reusing API features. They identify 'smells' in API documentation as indicators of poor design choices that impede proper understanding and usability. These smells can lead to confusion, errors, and ultimately decrease developer productivity.

Identifying Documentation Smells

To validate their findings, Khan et al. conducted a thorough analysis of 1,000 Java official API reference documents for common patterns or smells in existing documentation styles. Through this process, they identified five distinct types: 1) Incomplete Information: This smell refers to missing or insufficient information about an API's functionality or usage guidelines. 2) Misleading Information: Incorrect or misleading information provided in the documentation. 3) Inconsistent Information: Contradictory or conflicting information within the documentation. 4) Unnecessary Information: Irrelevant or redundant information that adds no value to the understanding of an API. 5) Inadequate Formatting: Poorly structured or formatted documentation that makes it challenging to read and comprehend.

Solutions for Improvement

The authors' aim is not only to identify these smells but also to provide solutions for improvement. To achieve this, they developed a catalog of these five smells, along with corresponding detection rules and automated tools.

Detection Techniques

One notable aspect of this study is the absence of prior research on automatically detecting API documentation smells. To bridge this gap, Khan et al. employ a combination of rule-based techniques and deep learning classifiers. These techniques analyze the text in API documents and flag potential instances of smells based on predefined rules.

The BERT Classifier

To further improve their detection methods, the authors also experimented with deep learning models - specifically BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers). This model achieved impressive F1-scores ranging from 0.75 to 0.97, outperforming all other classifiers used in the study.

Validation through Survey

To validate their findings, Khan et al. conducted a survey involving 21 professional software developers who were asked to evaluate existing API documentation for common smells identified by the researchers. The results showed that these smells are prevalent in current API documentation and significantly hinder productivity.

Conclusion

Presented at the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), Khan et al.'s paper sheds light on an often overlooked aspect of software development - the quality of API documentation. By providing insights into common pitfalls and offering solutions for improvement through automated detection methods, their work aims to enhance developer experiences and streamline the utilization of APIs for more efficient software development practices. This research serves as a valuable resource for API creators and developers alike, emphasizing the importance of well-designed documentation in maximizing the potential of APIs.