A Further Note on an Innovations Approach to Viterbi Decoding of Convolutional Codes

Authors: Masato Tajima

26 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables

Abstract: In this paper, we show that the soft-decision input to the main decoder in an SST Viterbi decoder is regarded as the innovation as well from the viewpoint of mutual information and mean-square error. It is assumed that a code sequence is transmitted symbol by symbol over an AWGN channel using BPSK modulation. Then we can consider the signal model, where the signal is composed of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the equiprobable binary input. By assuming that the soft-decision input to the main decoder is the innovation, we show that the minimum mean-square error (MMSE) in estimating the binary input is expressed in terms of the distribution of the encoded block for the main decoder. It is shown that the obtained MMSE satisfies indirectly the known relation between the mutual information and the MMSE in Gaussian channels. Thus the derived MMSE is justified, which in turn implies that the soft-decision input to the main decoder can be regarded as the innovation. Moreover, we see that the input-output mutual information is connected with the distribution of the encoded block for the main decoder.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Feb. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2102.07315v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 28 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.