Predicting Customer Lifetime Values -- ecommerce use case

AI-generated keywords: E-commerce Predictions Neural Network Statistical Model Lifetime Value

AI-generated Key Points

  • The study focuses on predicting customer future purchases and lifetime value in e-commerce.
  • Two approaches are compared: a 'buy-till-you-die' statistical model and a neural network model.
  • Historical purchase data is used for predictions due to the noncontractual nature of customer-firm relationships.
  • Clearly's customer purchase historical data, consisting of approximately 2 million customers over 5 years, is utilized.
  • Various features are extracted for each customer, including lifetime duration, number of purchases, average gaps between purchases, average revenue from purchases, days since first and last buy, and number of coupons used.
  • The goal is to predict customer purchases within the next 6 months.
  • The training dataset spans from June 2015 to June 2020 while the testing dataset covers June 2020 to December 2020 (a 6-month holdout period).
  • Lifetimes Python library is used for implementing the statistical model with detailed purchase date and amount data.
  • Good predictions can be achieved quickly with this approach.
  • A fully connected neural network model is built using summarized data after testing multiple configurations.
  • The study includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of both methods.
  • Insights into their performance are provided along with recommendations for different scenarios.
  • Opportunities for future research are identified.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ziv Pollak

7 pages
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Predicting customer future purchases and lifetime value is a key metrics for managing marketing campaigns and optimizing marketing spend. This task is specifically challenging when the relationships between the customer and the firm are of a noncontractual nature and therefore the future purchases need to be predicted based mostly on historical purchases. This work compares two approaches to predict customer future purchases, first using a 'buy-till-you-die' statistical model to predict customer behavior and later using a neural network on the same dataset and comparing the results. This comparison will lead to both quantitative and qualitative analysis of those two methods as well as recommendation on how to proceed in different cases and opportunities for future research.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Feb. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2102.05771v1

The study focuses on predicting customer future purchases and lifetime value in the context of e-commerce. The task is challenging due to the noncontractual nature of the customer-firm relationships, which requires relying mostly on historical purchase data for predictions. The research compares two approaches: a 'buy-till-you-die' statistical model and a neural network model. To conduct the comparison, the researchers utilize Clearly's customer purchase historical data, consisting of approximately 2 million customers over a period of 5 years. Various features are extracted for each customer, including lifetime duration, number of purchases, average gaps between purchases, average revenue from purchases, days since first and last buy, and number of coupons used. The goal is to predict customer purchases within the next 6 months. The training dataset spans from June 2015 to June 2020 while the testing dataset covers June 2020 to December 2020 (a 6-month holdout period). For the statistical model implementation Lifetimes Python library is employed using detailed purchase date and amount data. It is noted that reasonably good predictions can be achieved quickly with this approach. On the other hand a fully connected neural network model is built using summarized data. Multiple configurations are tested before settling on the final one. The study includes both quantitative and qualitative analysis of these two methods providing insights into their performance and offering recommendations for different scenarios as well as identifying opportunities for future research.
Created on 22 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.